Quantcast
Channel: www.Esoteric-Philosophy.com
Viewing all 550 articles
Browse latest View live

THE RULE OF SINCERITY

$
0
0
Letter from an Eastern Sage Shows
the Severity Needed in True Discipleship


A Mahatma of the Himalayas

 An image of the Himalayas, in a painting by Nicholas Roerich



0000000000000000000000000000000000000

We  reproduce below letter 24 of  “Letters
from the Masters of the Wisdom”, First
Series (TPH, India, 1973). The text has a
great importance for various reasons, three of
which should be mentioned here. In the first
place, the letter shows the frankness and direct
language used by authentic sages. The contrast
is evident with the artificial sweetness of the
fake masters fabricated by Charles Leadbeater,
Annie Besant, Geoffrey Hodson and other ill-
informed persons. Second, the letter indicates
the grave danger of any lack of sincerity along
the path to knowledge. The axiom included by
H.P. Blavatsky in her article “Chelas and
Lay Chelas”: Deserve, Then Desire.Thirdly,
the letter shows the situation of a direct disciple
who is but one step from losing the privilege of
having his efforts watched and helped by Masters.

(Carlos Cardoso Aveline)

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Letter 24

To a Chela

So then, you really imagined when you were allowed to call yourself my chela - that the black memories of your past offences were either hidden from my notice or that I knew and still forgave? Did you fancy that I connived at them? Foolish ...!  thrice foolish! It was to help save you from your viler Self, to arouse in you better aspirations; to cause the voice of your offended “soul” to be heard; to give you the stimulus to make some reparation ... for these only your prayer to become my chela was granted. We are the agents of Justice, not the unfeeling lictors [1] of a cruel god. Base as you have been, vilely as you have misused your talents … blind as you have been to the claims of gratitude, virtue and equity, you have still in you the qualities of a good man -  (dormant indeed, so far!) and a useful chela. But how long your relations with us will continue - depends alone upon yourself. You may struggle up out of the mire, or glide back into depths of vice and misery now inconceivable to your imagination … remember, … that you stand before your Atma, which is your judge, and which no smiles, nor falsehoods, nor sophistries can deceive.  Hitherto you had but bits of chits from me and - knew me not; now you know me better, for it is I who accuse you before your awakened conscience. You need make no lip-promises to Itor me, no half-way confessions. Though … you shed oceans of tears and grovel in the dust, this will not move a hair’s breadth the balance of Justice. If you would recover the lost ground do two things: make the amplest, most complete reparation … and to the good of mankind devote your energies … Try to fill each day’s measure with pure thoughts, wise words, kindly deeds. I shall neither order, nor mesmerize, nor sway you. But unseen and when you perhaps come - like so many others - to disbelieve in my existence, I shall watch your career and sympathise in your struggles. If you come out victorious at the end of your probation I shall be the readiest to welcome you. And now - there run two paths before you, choose! When you have chosen you may consult your visible official superior - H.S. Olcott, and I will instruct him thro’ his Guru to guide and send you on…

You aspire to be a missionary of theosophy; be one - if you can be one in fact. But rather than go about preaching with a heart and a life that belie your professions - conjure the lightning to strike you dead, for every word will become your future accuser. Go and consult with Col. Olcott  -  confess your faults before that good man - and seek his advice.

                       K.H.

NOTE:

[1]Lictors:  Ancient Rome officials who carried the fasces and assisted magistrates in making arrests and carrying out sentences.

000000000

  
On the difference between truth and falsehood in the esoteric movement, see the book “The Fire and Light of Theosophical Literature”, by Carlos Cardoso Aveline.  Published in 2013 by The Aquarian Theosophist, the volume has 255 pages and can be obtained through  Amazon Books.
  
On Facebook, see the pages The Aquarian Theosophist  and  E-Theosophy.


If you want to have access to a daily study of the original teachings of Theosophy, write to  lutbr@terra.com.br  and ask for information on the e-group  E-Theosophy.

00000000000000000000000000000000000000

PLEDGES IN THEOSOPHY, REAL AND PHONY

$
0
0
Esoteric Frauds Use Vows to Obtain
Political Control Over Sincere People



Carlos Cardoso Aveline




The decision to search for truth has many a challenging result and consequence, since all that glitters is not gold. 

There is for instance a complex relationship between truthfulness and brotherhood, along the path to wisdom. 

A “brotherly hypocrisy” leads no one to spiritual liberation. Friendship and brotherhood cannot be put above truthfulness.   An “ugly” truth is better than a “beautiful” lie. However, choosing truth in every occasion and under whatever form implies a degree of sacrifice.  We shall see that in the next few paragraphs.

The Vow of an Aspirant

In the esoteric school founded by H.P. Blavatsky in 1888, every new member made a vow with seven clauses, the seventh and unnumbered clause being an appeal to one’s own higher self, or immortal soul.

The vow said:

1. I pledge myself to endeavour to make Theosophy a living factor in my life.

2. I pledge myself to support, before the world, the Theosophical movement, its leaders and its members.

3. I pledge myself never to listen without protest to any evil thing spoken of a Brother Theosophist and to abstain from condemning others.

4. I pledge myself to maintain a constant struggle against my lower nature, and to be charitable to the weaknesses of others.

5. I pledge myself to do all in my power, by study or otherwise, to fit myself to help and teach others.

6. I pledge myself to give what support I can to the movement in time, money, and work.

“So Help Me, My Higher Self.” [1]


Loyalty is of great importance in theosophy, and a few questions should be examined,  regarding points 2 and 3 above.   

* How can one who made such a pledge denounce the fabrication of phony Masters, or criticize the invention of false portraits of Masters and the creation of imaginary dialogues with Mahatmas, all of which was done by well-known “theosophists” and leaders of the esoteric movement?  

* Could that be an unbrotherly attitude towards Mrs. Annie Besant and her associates, among them the Catholic priest Geoffrey Hodson?

* Is not the protection of lies and frauds the inevitable result of such a brotherly vow, as long as the wrongdoing is committed by our own best leaders and friends?

* Is it not correct to piously cheat, lie and act in a dishonest way, as long as we tell ourselves that we are doing that for a noble cause and to serve the theosophical Mahatmas?

Higher Self the Final Authority

The matter of fact is that fraud, pious or not, leads one away from theosophy and from any wise teachers.

And - true vows can never lead to blind obedience.  However, one must admit that esoteric frauds use Vows to obtain political control over sincere people.

Two main things must therefore be acknowledged with regard to the pledge reproduced above. 

1) The first one is that the pledge in the esoteric school created by H.P. Blavatsky is something whose expression is not for the others - “authorities” or otherwise - to judge. It is a commitment made by each one before his or her conscience, above all. No bishop, priest, formal leader, or public opinion is entitled to say whether anyone broke or not his commitment to his own higher self.  The authority is the wordless voice of one’s conscience.

2) The second point is that no pledge is ever valid, if interpreted as an obligation to protect fraud, lies, or treason.  

A mafia (or a priestly organization) can induce people to promote and to protect lies in the name of loyalty. This does not apply to a sacred pledge involving one’s own higher self.

No pledged member of a theosophical movement or association has the obligation to protect what he considers falsehood or wrongdoing. 

In 2002, I presented to Mrs. Radha Burnier - the leader of the Adyar Esoteric School -  documented evidence that Annie Besant and Charles Leadbeater had created a fraudulent version of discipleship.  Mrs. Burnier answered in writing and said that everyone is entitled to think according to his conscience. She then washed her hands. I was a Pledged or Senior member of the Adyar Esoteric School by then. Various Adyar  friends and colleagues  invited me to keep silent as to the evidence I had gathered.  However, that was not acceptable:  I did not believe in blind-belief. 

Another example of the same principle of individual responsibility as to pledges made can be useful, and it does not involve the Adyar Theosophical Society.  

Robert Crosbie (1849-1919)  is often accused of having broken his pledge of allegiance to  Katherine Tingley’s Esoteric School  (in the Point Loma Society)  when he walked away from it in 1904 and formally founded the United Lodge of Theosophists, ULT,   in February 1909.  

In this case, too, as in several others, people should understand that the authentic pledge is made to no outer authority.  It is a commitment of oneself to his own higher self.  Crosbie would have broken his Vow to his higher self only if he had remained in an Esoteric School which had lost his confidence.

The present Adyar Esoteric School pledge of obedience to the Outer Head (made and signed in paper by its “Pledged” or Senior members) has therefore no real value and, if taken seriously, is phony.   

Mrs. Radha Burnier, the honest Outer Head of Adyar School since 1978, has implicitly shown she understands that.  

On the other hand, one must admit that most problems of the Adyar Esoteric School are not recent.  In 1895 it was totally distorted by Annie Besant and made to serve the parody of the Return of the Christ (1911-1930).  Even now, the Adyar School members are seldom invited to study any text of real theosophy.  It is due to the good but severe law of karma that the Besantian version of HPB’s esoteric school has been seriously debilitated since the end of 20th century. Many of its members do not take its pledges seriously: the international elections of 2007-2008 clearly showed that. [2] 

As the theosophical movement adapts itself to the new cycle in the years ahead, the conclusion is inevitable:  the policy of “business as usual” does not work any longer. Another strategy must be created and adopted.  

The Adyar School is not the only example of unrealistic approaches to the challenge of aspiration for lay discipleship. There are several of them, and they are all based on blind belief. 

They must be re-examined in the present century from the point of view of the inevitable self-renewal present in all life.  The true and unbureaucratic approach to lay discipleship  is always available through classic theosophy and through the universal, timeless ethics; but it needs actively researching minds, and lazy brains cannot attain to it through blind obedience.   

NOTES:

[1] From the text “The Meaning of a Pledge”, by “One Who Is Pledged”, which is available at  www.TheosophyOnline.com,  www.Esoteric-Philosophy.comand  www.FilosofiaEsoterica.com .

[2] See the text “The 2007-2008 Events in Adyar”, by Pedro R. M. de Oliveira, in www.TheosophyOnline.com  and  www.Esoteric-Philosophy.com .

000000000000

On the difference between truth and falsehood in the esoteric movement, see the book “The Fire and Light of Theosophical Literature”, by Carlos Cardoso Aveline.

Published in 2013 by The Aquarian Theosophist, the volume has 255 pages and can be obtained through  Amazon Books.
  
On Facebook, see the pages The Aquarian Theosophist  and  E-Theosophy.



If you want to have access to a daily study of the original teachings of Theosophy, write to  lutbr@terra.com.br  and ask for information on the e-group  E-Theosophy.


00000000000000000000000000000000000000

THE AQUARIAN THEOSOPHIST, OCTOBER 2013

$
0
0
Volume XIII, Number 12



The opening quotation of the October edition is from an Eastern Mahatma who wrote: 

“You have much to unlearn.”

The note on pp. 1-2 defends the idea that the books by French thinker Maine de Biran (1766-1824)  have something important to teach students of theosophy  regarding the principles of consciousness.

On pages 2 and 3, an article focuses on the “social usefulness of hypocrisy” according to the point of view adopted by Russian philosopher Nicolas Berdyaev.  The note helps one understand the opposition between “the Russian Soul” and Western Europe’s brotherly forms of falsehood and forgery. Tolstoy, HPB, Dostoievsky, Gogol, Khomiakov and other Russians actively disliked the art of saying beautiful lies.

A note on p. 4 discusses the relation between Divine Presence and Renunciation.

From the United States, the long-standing ULT associate Steven H. Levy, writes an article on the “Planetary Mysteries of Our Solar System”.  After a short note about The Source of Universal Brotherhood, we have an article by the experienced member of the Adyar Theosophical Society in India, Dr. N. C. Ramanujachary. It’s entitled The True Work of the Theosophical Movement.

On pages 13-14, a note on the kind of insights one has while studying “The Secret Doctrine”, the masterpiece of theosophical literature, ancient and modern.

The new book published by “The Aquarian Theosophist” is mentioned at a note on pages 14-15. Its title is “The Fire and Light of Theosophical Literature”.

The 17 pp. edition closes with the List of New Titles in our Websites and two brief notes:  “On the Need to Unlearn” and “Truth and Maya in Daily Life”.  



0000000000000

You can find the whole collection of The Aquarian  Theosophist”  at   www.TheosophyOnline.com .


If you want to have access to a daily study of the original teachings of Theosophy, write to  lutbr@terra.com.brand ask for information on the e-group  E-Theosophy.


000000000000000000000000000000000000000

THE COSMIC CREATION IN EVERY FOETUS

$
0
0
And the Cyclic Art Of Being Born Again  


Carlos Cardoso Aveline





According to an ancient axiom, the whole is present in each one of its parts. The idea is not always easy to understand. How exactly can a human being be present in each of its own living cells, or the unlimited universe pulsate in every atom?

The secret relationship between macrocosm and microcosm contains the mysteries of great initiations. It cannot be explained in words, but words are useful tools as we investigate it. 

In the 19th century, a Western lay disciple asked to an Eastern Raja Yogi: 

Does every mineral form, vegetable, plant, animal, always contain within it that entity which involves the potentiality of development into a planetary spirit?”

And the Master answered:

“Invariably; only rather call it the germ of a future entity, which it has been for ages. Take the human foetus. From the moment of its first planting until it completes its seventh month of gestation it repeats in miniature the mineral, vegetable, and animal cycles it passed through in its previous encasements, and only during the last two, develops its future human entity. It is completed but towards the child’s seventh year. Yet it existed without any increase or decreaseaeons on aeons before it worked its way onward, through and in the womb of mother nature as it works now in its earthly mother’s bosom.”

And the Mahatma added:

“Truly said a learned philosopher who trusts more to his intuitions than the dicta of modern science: ‘The stages of man’s intra-uterine existence embody a condensed record of some of the missing pages in Earth’s history.’  Thus you must look back at the animal, vegetable and mineral entities. You must take each entity at its starting point in the manvantaric course as the primordial cosmic atom already differentiated by the first flutter of the manvantaric life breath.” [1]

In the same letter, the Master said:

“The myriad specific manifestations of these six universal elements are in their turn but the offshoots, branches or branchlets of the one single primordial ‘Tree of Life’. Take Darwin’s genealogical tree of life of the human race and others and bearing ever in mind the wise old adage, ‘As below so above’ - that is the universal system of correspondences - try to understand by analogy. Thus will you see that in this day on this present earth in every mineral, etc., there is such a spirit. I will say more. Every grain of sand, every boulder or crag of granite, is that spirit crystallized or petrified.” [2]

Finally, the Mahatma asks to his disciple:

“How then can we doubt that a mineral contains in it a spark of the One as everything else in this objective nature does?” [3]

On Talking to the Sun and Being Born Again

A  planetary rebirth must take place in individual consciousness


Big and small are analogous. Just like the planet Earth, each human being is a sort of “general assembly” gathering together an immense diversity of lives. One’s individual consciousness presides over a vast federation of thoughts and feelings, not all of which belong to oneself.  Theosophy teaches that humans have seven “principles” or levels of consciousness, and each of them, seven sub-principles. These 49 (7 x 7) levels of life in fact are universes of their own. They are never separated. They always interact among them in a thousand ways. 

One has an emotional universe and an intellectual universe, and no boundaries separate them. 

Each cell in the human body has its own form of intelligence, and its habits. Hosts of “beings” inhabit one’s lower self-emotions, one’s animal life and self-preservation instincts. From our higher self, generous thoughts and emotions come which are “inhabited” by correspondingly noble forms of vitality. 

Every day some of the old and ignorant forms of life must die, so that they will not repeat themselves. Each new hour some wiser forms of life can be created as we make progress along the path to wisdom.  

One also learns during sleep. Upon awakening in the morning one might think of the source of light, both physical and spiritual - and say to oneself:

“I ask my elder brother, the Sun, to enlighten in this day both wisdom and ignorance in myself, so that ignorance can die a peaceful death and wisdom may be born.” 

To commit oneself to life is the same as committing oneself to truth. It implies a cosmic or planetary rebirth in one’s consciousness.  

 In ancient times the initiates were called Dwijas: the “twice-born” in Sanskrit


According to Theosophy the inner Sun is both the source of Truth and of Life. It shines in every human heart, and the path to wisdom is the solar path.  Initiations along it - big and small - are rebirths.

In ancient times, the Eastern Initiates were called Dwijas in Sanskrit; the twice- born, those who were born first physically, and then came to life again in the spiritual world.   More recently, the New Testament Jesus repeats the same pagan and ancient teaching.

Outwardly, Jesus says:

“Let the children alone, and do not hinder them from coming to Me; for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these.” (Matthew, 19:14)

But the actual meaning of this statement, from an initiatic point of view, is:

“Only the newly-born, or twice-born, can get to the universal truth.”

Elsewhere, the New Testament Master says: 

“Truly I tell you, unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.” (Matthew, 18:3)   Or, in other words:

“Truly I tell you, anyone who will not receive the kingdom of God like a little child will never enter it.”  (Mark 10:15)

Along the theosophical path, wisdom is obtained by learning to consciously die and be born again in emotion and thought, while keeping the physical body alive and well.  

A long journey starts with the first step; an atom contains a magnetic miniature of our solar system. Small initiations prepare the bigger ones, and every day a combination of right action and renunciation helps pave the way to eternal bliss.

NOTES:

[1]“The Mahatma Letters”, TUP edition, Pasadena, CA, USA, Letter XV, pp. 88-89.

[2] “The Mahatma Letters”, TUP edition, p. 92.

[3]“The Mahatma Letters”, TUP edition, p. 93.

00000000000000

See also the texts “Pascal’s Sphere”, by Jorge Luis Borges, and “The Center of Pascal’s Sphere”, by Carlos Cardoso Aveline.  Both articles are available at www.TheosophyOnline.com , www.Esoteric-Philosophy.com and their associated websites.

00000000000000000000


On the difference between truth and falsehood in the esoteric movement, see the book “The Fire and Light of Theosophical Literature”, by Carlos Cardoso Aveline.  Published in 2013 by The Aquarian Theosophist, the volume has 255 pages and can be obtained through  Amazon Books.
  
On Facebook, see the pages The Aquarian Theosophist  and  E-Theosophy.



If you want to have access to a daily study of the original teachings of Theosophy, write to  lutbr@terra.com.br  and ask for information on the e-group  E-Theosophy.


00000000000000000000000000000000000000

N. C. RAMANUJACHARY: LIVING UP TO THE ORIGINAL PROGRAM

$
0
0
A Dialogue On the Perspectives of the
Adyar Society After Radha Burnier’s Presidency


Carlos Cardoso Aveline


 Ms. Radha Burnier (1923-2013)



000000000000000000000000000000000000000

In the following interview, given to “The
Aquarian Theosophist” and its associated
websites, Dr. N. C. Ramanujachary makes
a frank assessment of the recent decades in
the life of the Theosophical Society (Adyar).
He formulates a few fundamental propositions
for its future efforts: among them, to promote the
Original Program of the theosophical movement.

Dr. N. C. Ramanujachary is currently the
Joint-General Secretary and Director of Studies
for the Indian Section of the Theosophical
Society (Adyar).  Born at Vijayawadain the
Krishna district of Andhrapradesy on 14th
February 1935, he has been a member of the Adyar
Society since 1958. Several of his articles can be
found at www.TheosophyOnline.com  and associated
websites. He lives in the BesantGardens, at the
International Headquarters in Adyar, Chennai, India.

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000



THE AQUARIAN:

Mrs. Radha Burnier, the president of the Adyar Theosophical Society since 1980, has passed away on October 31, 2013.  She led a life of altruism. She was a strong and inspiring leader. One could make a Pythagorean review of the TS efforts under her leadership.

N. C. RAMANUJACHARY:

Mrs. Burnier held the office of International President of the Theosophical Society for 33 years (1980-2013), which is far beyond that occupied by any of her predecessors.

She brings with her a sort of inherent culture.  She belonged to a family associated with the work of the Society almost from the time of its arrival at Adyar (Madras/Chennai) in 1882. She was born on the campus of the Society and lived therein (except for few years) all her life. She studied the languages and philosophies of the times, held offices such as General Secretary of Indian Section (the largest in numerical strength), was the Director of the Adyar Library and Research Centre, one of the remarkable centers in the world.  Mrs. Burnier was also the President of Theosophical Order of Service, Besant Educational Fellowship, New Life for India Movement, Environmental Society,  etc. She was deeply interested in the spiritual regeneration of humanity, among other lively themes. She was also involved with the work and philosophy of J. Krishnamurti, and helped in reestablishing his Centre in Madrasin its troubled times.

THE AQUARIAN:

What’s your general view of the historical period between 1980 and 2013?

N. C. RAMANUJACHARY:

Any period in history is “contemporary” and the same time “transitory”. This was comparatively a “peaceful” and “comfortable” period for sincere and genuine work, particularly in the sphere of popularizing the theosophical ideals, principles and tenets.

Ground work was well prepared and seeded by the earlier generation members and leaders. There was verbal and vocal acceptance for all good things and concepts, but the behavioral patterns of people were diametrically opposite. A sort of “artificial” and “pseudo” structure came to be established in all walks of life. Undeclared confusion in the human consciousness became the “order of the day”. Wrong and unethical values of life have come to be obtaining “acceptance”. All this needed a continued and consistent “good and advanced work” from organizations such as the Theosophical Society.

THE AQUARIAN:

What were some of the major accomplishments in these decades?

N. C. RAMANUJACHARY:

Survival and Sustenance of Human Values, in spite of the confused state of human predicament, appears to be the hallmark of the period. “Satyameva Jayete, naa anritam” (Truth alone survives victorious, not the unrighteous) is the hope of the Few who are determined and rooted in Intelligence (Dharma Nishta and Sthita Prajna). A lot of Unfinished Agenda is before them and needs to be pursued effectively and logically.

THE AQUARIAN:

What good things could have been done, but were not possible, and why? 

N. C. RAMANUJACHARY:

Goodness is the fundamental and ultimate virtue; it can be forked in numerous rays. Once it is definite that “To Live to Benefit Humanity” is the highest ideal worth living for, men and women of the world choose their unique and particular way.

In order “to popularize the doctrines of theosophy”, there is unavoidable need to present the doctrines in the popular and presentable language of the ever-changing times.
Rewriting and retelling the concepts; ruling out the thin line of demarcation between the ancient and the modern thought is necessary.

The Adyar Library was established in 1886 to encourage the study of Comparative Religion, Philosophy and Science among educated classes. There is a need to tune them to the study of theosophical tenets, establishing peace and harmony in the Human Heart, and making them the “living truths” of the day is apparent. Reinterpreting the truths in the present day context, not just reiterating them, and bringing up new series of texts in the world-languages could be accelerated.

We need literature to improve the “quality of life” and to pave the way for the bright and well illuminated future of humanity at large. The intrinsic and implied meanings of the three declared objects [1] and the few “undeclared” objects are to be focused sufficiently well to show them as the basic need for human advancement in its total panorama.   Added to the Man-power, the need  is “Will-power”.

THE AQUARIAN:

Looking at the accumulated experience since 1980, what are some of the main lessons regarding the future of the Adyar Theosophical Society?

N. C. RAMANUJACHARY:

To live up to the “Original Program” and to ventilate the fundamentals of the “esoteric” philosophy that have rightly become the “exoteric”. 

To improve the circulation of theosophical literature, periodicals and magazines committed to the doctrines and their dissemination. 

Making “real” the three objects: helping the Human nature dovetail into the Divine.

THE AQUARIAN:

Considering that just like seeds planted, small actions may have great consequences in due time, what should be done now, in order to pave the way to a correct future of the theosophical movement and with regard to the certainly bright future of mankind as a whole?

N. C. RAMANUJACHARY:

Bringing together all the Right-minded and the like-minded population into a common stream and showing that “there is no other way” (Na-anyah-pantha) to the welfare and prosperity of the planet.

Total elimination of the personality and every notion connected with “I and Mine”; and a deep resolve to adhere to the Collective Good.

THE AQUARIAN:

What are the main duties of the theosophical movement towards “the great orphan”, humanity, in the first half of the present century?

N. C. RAMANUJACHARY:

To tell them convincingly that they are the “orphan” and there is a way to “redeem” and “restore” them. To tell them that they have a Spiritual Right on the globe/universe; there is absolute need to dispel the ‘intellectual pride’ (not allowing that to become the spiritual pride).

To make it abundantly clear that the “future” depends on what we do now; and to see the “duration” as continuous and time as mere “continual”. Consciousness is a deep ocean, eternal and infinite.

THE AQUARIAN:

What can each sincere theosophist around the world do in order to help the theosophical movement fulfill its duties?

N. C. RAMANUJACHARY:

To be deeply soaked in the “fundamental” and ineffable doctrines as envisaged and as would be found out, rediscovered; help others see the truth of the matter and “honestly” live up to what they believe. To allow no dichotomy between Precept and Practice, Belief and Behavior, Promise and Performance -; this must be the minimum program.

THE AQUARIAN:

What kind of leaders does the theosophical movement need now, in the Theosophical Society (Adyar) as in other associations, and globally as well as locally?

N. C. RAMANUJACHARY:

A leader must always be the one who stands out Unique and Important, though not proclaiming himself as such, and readily prepared to understand the universal mind.


NOTE:

[1] The three declared Objects of the Theosophical Movement are:  1) To form a nucleus of the universal brotherhood of humanity, without distinction of race, creed, sex, caste or color; 2) To encourage the comparative study of religion, philosophy and science (especially Eastern) ;  3) To investigate unexplained laws of nature and the powers latent in humanity.  (CCA)

00000000

The above article was published on 7 November 2013.

00000000000000


On the difference between truth and falsehood in the esoteric movement, see the book “The Fire and Light of Theosophical Literature”, by Carlos Cardoso Aveline.  Published in 2013 by The Aquarian Theosophist, the volume has 255 pages and can be obtained through  Amazon Books.
  
On Facebook, see the pages The Aquarian Theosophist  and  E-Theosophy.
  


If you want to have access to a daily study of the original teachings of Theosophy, write to  lutbr@terra.com.br  and ask for information on the e-group  E-Theosophy.


00000000000000000000000000000000000000

HIEROCLES, ON MARRIAGE

$
0
0
A Classical Pythagorean Text Examines
The Bond of Love That Creates a Family   

Hierocles of Alexandria




00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

The following text, by Pythagorean thinker 
 Hierocles of Alexandria (Fifth Century, C.E.), is
reproduced from the volume “The Pythagorean
Sourcebook and Library”, An Anthology of Ancient
Writings Which Relate to Pythagoras and
Pythagorean Philosophy, Compiled and Translated by
Kenneth Sylvan Guthrie, Phanes Press, 1987, pp. 281-284.

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000


The discussion of marriage is most necessary as the whole of our race is naturally social, and the most fundamental social association is that effected by marriage.

Without a household there could be no cities; and households of the unmarried are most imperfect, while on the contrary those of the married are most complete. That is why, in our treatise On Families, we have shown that the married state is to be preferred by the sage, while a single life is not to be chosen except under peculiar circumstances.

Therefore, inasmuch as we should imitate the man of intellect so far as possible, and as for him marriage is preferable, it is evident it will be so also for us, except if hindered by some exceptional circumstance. This is the first reason for marriage.

Entirely apart from the model of the sage, Nature herself seems to incite us thereto. Not only did she make us gregarious, but adapted to sexual intercourse, and proposed the procreation of children and stability of life as the one and universal work of wedlock. Now Nature justly teaches us that a choice of such things as are fit should be made so as to accord with what she has procured for us.

Every animal, therefore, lives in conformity to its natural constitution, and so also every plant lives in harmony with its laws of life. But there exists this difference, that the latter do not employ any reasoning or calculation in the selection of the things on which they lay hold, using nature along without participation in [rational] soul. Animals are drawn to investigate what may be proper for them by imagination and desires. To us, however, Nature gave reason to survey everything else and, together with all things - nay, prior to all things - to direct its attention to Nature itself, so as to tend towards her as a glorious aim, in an orderly manner, that by choosing everything consonant with her, we might live in a becoming manner. Following this line of argument, he will not error in saying that a family without wedlock is imperfect, for nature does not conceive of the governor without the governed, nor of the governed without a governor. Nature therefore seems to me to shame those who are adverse to marriage.

In the next place, marriage is beneficial. First, because it produces a truly divine fruit, the procreation of children who are, as partaking of our nature, to assist us in all our undertakings while our strength is yet undiminished; and when we shall be worn out, oppressed with old age, they will be our assistants. In prosperity they will be the associates of our joy and, in adversity, the sympathetic diminishers of our sorrows.

Marriage is beneficial not only because of procreation of children, but for the association of a wife. When we are wearied with our labors outside of the home, she receives us with officious kindness and refreshes us by her solicitous attentions. Next, she induces a forgetfulness of molestations outside of the house. The annoyances in the forum, the gymnasium, or the country, and in short all the vicissitudes of our intercourse with friends and acquaintances, do not disturb us so obviously, being obscured by our necessary occupations; but when released from these, we return home, and our mind has time to reflect, then availing themselves of this opportunity these cares and anxieties rush in upon us, to torment us, at the very moment when life seems cheerless and lonely. Then comes the wife as a great solace and, by making some inquiry about external affairs, or by referring to and together considering some domestic problem, she, by her sincere vivacity inspires him with pleasure and delight. It is needless to enumerate all the help a wife can be in festivals, when making sacrifice; or, during her husband’s journeys, she can keep the household running smoothly, and direct at times of urgency; or in managing the domestics and in nursing her husband when sick.

In summary: in order to pass through life properly, all men need two things - the aid of relatives, and kindly sympathy. But nothing can be more sympathetic than a wife, nor anything more kindred than children. Both of these are afforded by marriage; how therefore could be found anything more beneficial?

Also beautiful is a married life, it seems to me. What relation can be more ornamental to a family than that between husband and wife? Not sumptuous edifices, nor walls covered with marble plaster, nor piazzas adorned with stones, which indeed are admired by those ignorant of true goods; nor paintings and arched myrtle walks, nor anything else which is the subject of astonishment to the stupid, is the ornament of a family. The beauty of a household consists in the conjunction of man and wife, united to each other by destiny, and consecrated to the Gods presiding over nuptial birth and houses, and who harmonize, and use all things in common for their bodies, or even their very souls; who likewise exercise a becoming authority over their house and servants; who are properly solicitous about the education of their children; and to the necessities of life pay an attention which is neither excessive nor negligent, but moderate and appropriate. For, as the most admirable Homer says, what can be more excellent

“Than when at home the husband and wife
Live in entire unanimity.”

(Odyssey, 7. 183)

That is the reason why I have frequently wondered at those who conceive that life in common with a woman must be burdensome and grievous. Though to them she appears to be a burden and molestation, she is not so; on the contrary, she is something light and easy to be borne or, rather, she possesses the power of charming away from her husband things burdensome and grievous. No trouble so great is there which cannot easily be borne by a husband and wife who harmonize and are willing to endure it in common. But what is truly burdensome and unbearable is imprudence, for through it things naturally light, and among others a wife, become heavy.

To many, indeed, marriage is intolerable, in reality not from itself, or because such an association as this with a woman is naturally insufferable, but when we marry the wrong person and, in addition to this, are ourselves entirely ignorant of life, and unprepared to take a wife in such a way as a free-born woman ought to be taken, then indeed it happens that this association with her becomes difficult and intolerable. Vulgar people do marry in this way, taking a wife neither for the procreation of children, nor for harmonious association, being attracted to the union by the magnitude of the dowry, or through physical attractiveness, or the like; and by following these bad counsellors, they pay no attention to the bride’s disposition and manners, celebrating nuptials to their own destruction, and with crowned doors introduce to themselves instead of a wife a tyrant, whom they cannot resist, and with whom they are unable to contend for chief authority.

Evidently, therefore, marriage becomes burdensome and intolerable to many, not through itself, but through these causes. But it is not wise to blame things which are not harmful, nor to make our own deficient use of these things the cause of our complaint against them. Most absurd, besides, is it feverishly to seek the auxiliaries of friendship, and achieve certain friends and associates to aid and defend us in the vicissitudes of life, without seeking and endeavoring to obtain the relief, defence and assistance afforded us by Nature, by the Gods, and by the laws, through a wife and children.

As to a numerous offspring, it is generally suitable to nature and marriage that all, or the majority of the offspring be nurtured. Many dissent from this, for a not very beautiful reason, through love of riches, and the fear of poverty as the greatest evil. To begin with, in procreating children we are not only begetting assistants, nurses for our old age, and associates in very vicissitude of life - we do not however beget them for ourselves alone, but in many ways also for our parents. To them our procreation of children is gratifying because, if we should suffer anything calamitous prior to their decease we shall, instead of ourselves, leave our children as the support of their old age. Then for a grandfather is it a beautiful thing to be conducted by the hands of his grandchildren, and by them to be considered worthy of every attention. Hence, in the first place, we shall gratify our own parents by paying attention to the procreation of children. In the next, we shall be cooperating with the ardent wishes and fervent prayers of those who begot us. They were solicitous about our birth from the first, thereby looking for an extended succession of themselves, that they should leave behind them children of children, therefore paying attention to our marriage, procreation and nurture. Hence, by marrying and begetting children we shall be, as it were, fulfilling a part of their prayers; while, acting contrarily, we shall be destroying the object of their deliberate choice.

Moreover, it would seem that everyone who voluntarily, and without some prohibiting circumstances avoids marriage and the procreation of children, accuses his parents of madness, as having engaged in wedlock without the right conception of things. Here we see an unavoidable contradiction. How could that man live without dissension who finds a pleasure in living and willingly continues in life, as one who was properly brought into existence by his parents, and yet conceives that for him procreation of offspring is something to be rejected?

We must remember that we beget children not only for our own sake but, as we have already stated, for our parents’; but further also for the sake of our friends and kindred. It is gratifying to see children which are our offspring on account of human kindness, relatives, and security. Like ships which, though greatly agitated by the waves, are secured by many anchors, so do those who have children, or whose friends or relatives have them, ride at anchor in port in absolute security. For this reason, then, will a man who is a lover of his kindred and associates earnestly desire to marry and beget children.

Our country also loudly calls upon us to do so. For after all we do not beget children so much for ourselves as for our country, procuring a race that may  follow us, and supplying the community with successors to ourselves. Hence the priest should realize that to the city he owes priests; the ruler,  that he owes rulers; the orator, that he owes orators; and in short, the citizen, that he owes citizens. So it is gratifying to those who compose a choric ballet that it should continue perennially; and as an army looks to the continuance of its soldiers, so the perpetuation of its citizens is a matter of concern to a city. A city would not need succession were it only a temporary grouping, of duration commensurate with the lifetime of any one man; but as it extends to many generations, and if it invokes a fortunate genius may endure for many ages, it is evidently necessary to direct its attention not only to its present, but also to its future, not despising our native soil, nor leaving it desolate, but establishing it in good hopes from our prosperity.


000000000000

See also the text “Turning a House Into a Temple”, by Carlos Cardoso Aveline, which is available at www.TheosophyOnline.comwww.Esoteric-Philosophy.com,  and  www.FilosofiaEsoterica.com  .

 

On the difference between truth and falsehood in the esoteric movement, see the book “The Fire and Light of Theosophical Literature”, by Carlos Cardoso Aveline.

Published in 2013 by The Aquarian Theosophist, the volume has 255 pages and can be obtained through  Amazon Books.
  
On Facebook, see the pages The Aquarian Theosophist  and  E-Theosophy.



If you want to have access to a daily study of the original teachings of Theosophy, write to  lutbr@terra.com.br  and ask for information on the e-group  E-Theosophy.


00000000000000000000000000000000000000

H.P. BLAVATSKY: A GREAT BETRAYAL

$
0
0
How Treason Took Place
In the Theosophical Movement

Alice Leighton Cleather



Ms. Alice Leighton Cleather
(1846-1938) remained loyal to ethics



0000000000000000000000000000

An Editorial Note:

The law of karma is dynamic
and no mistake is eternal, for the
very purpose of life is to learn. As a
result of this, the theosophical movement
is getting rid in the 21st century of the
organized falsity created by Annie Besant
and her associates in the 1895-1934 period.   

The victory of ethics was in part prepared by
the pioneers who, although unable to prevent
a short-term victory of disloyalty, succeeded
in documenting facts so that the following
generations could know them well and act
accordingly when the right time came.
Alice L. Cleather was a personal student of
Helena Blavatsky in London, and published
 various testimonies written in plain language.
Her 1922 book “H.P. Blavatsky: A Great
Betrayal” is a bright example of sincerity and love
of truth. Ms. Cleather deserves the gratitude of all
theosophists for having chosen truth, instead of mere politics.

(Carlos Cardoso Aveline, in November 2013)

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000



H.P. Blavatsky: A Great Betrayal

Alice Leighton Cleather

Foreword 

[September, 1922]

This Protest has been undertaken at the earnest and repeated requests of Theosophical friends of long standing. They feel strongly that the time has come for one of H. P. Blavatsky’s old pupils, who was a member of her Inner Group [1], to demonstrate as clearly as possible that the teachings promulgated for nearly twenty years past by the present leaders of the “Theosophical Society” have departed more and more from H.P.B.’s, and are now their direct antithesis, particularly on the fundamental question of sex morality.

Since Mr. G. R. S. Mead, one of my fellow-members of the Inner Group, spoke out at the Leadbeater Inquiry of 1906, and resigned, no other surviving member, so far as I have been able to ascertain, has attempted to stem the awful and ever increasing tide of horror and delusion, that is, engulfing - one might almost say has engulfed - Mrs. Besant’s Society. If Mr. Mead could say in 1906; - “We stand on the brink of an abyss”, what is to be said now? The enquiries and researches I have undertaken to enable me to write this pamphlet have revealed the present state of things to be far worse than I could have imagined possible.



NOTE:

[1] A reference to the Inner Group of the EsotericSchool.  (CCA)


000000000000

See also the text “The Fraud in Adyar Esoteric School”, by Carlos Cardoso Aveline, which is available at www.TheosophyOnline.comwww.Esoteric-Philosophy.com,  and  www.FilosofiaEsoterica.com  .

On the difference between truth and falsehood in the esoteric movement, see the book “The Fire and Light of Theosophical Literature”, by Carlos Cardoso Aveline.


Published in 2013 by The Aquarian Theosophist, the volume “The Fire and Light of Theosophical Literature” has 255 pages and can be obtained through  Amazon Books.
  
On Facebook, see the pages The Aquarian Theosophist  and  E-Theosophy.
  


 
 
If you want to have access to a daily study of the original teachings of Theosophy, write to  lutbr@terra.com.br  and ask for information on the e-group  E-Theosophy.


00000000000000000000000000000000000000

THEOSOPHICAL GLOSSARY NOT BY HPB

$
0
0
Its Editor, G.R.S. Mead, Wrongly
Used Helena P. Blavatsky’s Name


Carlos Cardoso Aveline





It is still easy to buy from “The Theosophy Company” and other publishers the volume “Theosophical Glossary”, whose authorship is wrongly ascribed to Helena P. Blavatsky.

In the Preface of the Glossary’s first edition, dated January 1892, its editor G. R. S. Mead admits the volume is “almost entirely posthumous”.  Helena Blavatsky had died in May 1891: she only saw in proof 32 of its 389 pages.

In “The Theosophist” (India), Henry Steel Olcott made a review of the Glossary in April 1892 (pp. 444-445). 

According to Olcott, if H.P.B. had lived to bring out the Glossary, she would have been much more careful with its contents. Olcott listed various examples of mistakes present in the volume, and added:

“Permitting the work to be hurried out with so many errors of omission and commission in its Sanskrit department, are we not playing into the hands of Prof. Müller and other Sanskritists who concur with him in calling us a lot of pseudo-scholars?”

 In spite of its mistakes, the volume is useful.  However, it should not bear H.P. Blavatsky’s name as its author.  In the book “The Dream That Never Dies”, one finds an article by Boris de Zirkoff on the Glossary published by G.R.S. Mead. [1]  

Under the emphatic title “Who Played That Trick on H.P.B.? - The Puzzle of The Theosophical Glossary”, Boris makes a detailed examination of Mead’s volume and shows many of its mistakes.  “The definitions of the Days and Nights of Brahmâ”, for instance, “are entirely wrong”. And this is a key topic in theosophy. 

According to Boris, “a partial survey of the first fourletters of the Glossary has revealed no less than 40 mistranslations out of about 300 terms, a very high percentage indeed.”

The Theosophy Co., Los Angeles, republished Mead’s Glossary in 1930. The action was possibly right for that particular point in history.  Mead’s Glossary was better than nothing.  However, it was already known by then that G.R.S. Mead had directly participated with Annie Besant in the distortion of and tampering with the original edition of “The Secret Doctrine”.  If that had been taken into due consideration, the Theosophy Co. could have abstained from adopting Mead’s Glossary.

But there are plenty of success stories in the history of the movement.  It was fortunate that in the late 1970s the Theosophical Society, Adyar, abandoned the spurious Besant/Mead version of “The Secret Doctrine”.  The same destiny may be waiting for Mead’s Glossary, regarding Theosophy Co. and other publishers.  Theosophical literature is capable of renewing itself, and the reading public has other and better reference books than Mead’s.

The Encyclopedic Theosophical Glossary

The best esoteric Glossary available has been around for quite a few years. It is the comprehensive online TUP edition of the Encyclopedic Theosophical Glossary, an electronic version of a Working Manuscript.  G. de Purucker is its Editor-in-Chief. Geoffrey Barborka is the Editor and Project Manager, and Grace F. Knoche the Editor. TheEncyclopedic Theosophical Glossary is reliable and well-documented. It points to its sources. It is free from pseudo-theosophical fancies and focuses on real philosophy. One should recommend it to readers and researchers. [2]

Joaquim Soares, member of the editorial council of “The Aquarian Theosophist”, was consulted about two other and more recent alternatives to Mead’s Glossary, both produced by members of the Adyar Society. They are the “TS Wiki” and the “Theosophical Encyclopedia”.  Joaquim reports:

“The TS Wiki  is an online theosophical encyclopedia working in a way similar to Wikipedia. Its administrators are connected with the Adyar Society in America. It is open to collaborative editorial work made by readers on a volunteer basis. It consists of sections. Its articles are linked with many sources on the internet. It is constantly expanding with more information and a great diversity of subjects. It must get even better along time.”  [3]

Another work is the Theosophical Encyclopedia published by the Adyar Society in the Philippines.  Joaquim says:

“The ‘Encyclopedia’ is a printed volume with 738 pages.  It has 1200 articles written by 110 authors, theosophical and pseudo-theosophical,  and constitutes a comprehensive reference book with articles on topics like theosophy, comparative religion, symbolism, psychical research and history of the Theosophical Society.” [4]

A Gradual Progress in Esoteric Literature

In Portuguese, Mead’s Glossary has had several
editions,  due to the misuse of H. P. Blavatsky’s name


Evolution and self-improvement in theosophical literature are rather slow. Changes take time to spread over various languages.  

Mead’s Glossary is still the main theosophical reference book available in Portuguese language, for instance. And it is helpful, in spite of its many mistakes.  Due to the misuse of Helena Blavatsky’s name, it is considered by many as a classic. 

In future editions, however, Mead’s “Theosophical Glossary” could well be published with his name as the author.  This would make it become more accurate - at least on its front cover - since it would let readers immediately know that Helena Blavatsky is not its author. 

G. R. S. Mead’s mistake is far from being an isolated fact.  It is equally incorrect to publish under HPB’s name any summaries of her works which (well-intentioned as they may be) were not penned by her and are quite different from what she wrote.  

An example among others is the Summary of “The Secret Doctrine” made by Michael Gomes.  Mr. Gomes uses the same title as the original work, and his volume is intensely ambiguous about its authorship.  

While it may be a temptation to some to misuse the name of a famous author like Helena Blavatsky, responsible editors always avoid that, out of respect for the public.  They know that readers have a right to immediately knowwho they will read, after all, and whose books they will possibly buy.

NOTES:

[1]“The Dream That Never Dies - Boris de Zirkoff Speaks Out On Theosophy”, Point Loma Publications, 237 pp., 1983, San Diego, CA. See pp. 81-85. The article was first published in the winter of 1967-1968.

[2] As of November 2013, the “Encyclopedic Theosophical Glossary” was available athttp://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/etgloss/etg-hp.htm.


[4] The Encyclopediacan be found at   http://www.theosophy.ph/encyclo.html.

000000000


On the difference between truth and falsehood in the esoteric movement, see the book “The Fire and Light of Theosophical Literature”, by Carlos Cardoso Aveline.  Published in 2013 by The Aquarian Theosophist, the volume has 255 pages and can be obtained through  Amazon Books.
  
On Facebook, see the pages The Aquarian Theosophist  and  E-Theosophy.



If you want to have access to a daily study of the original teachings of Theosophy, write to  lutbr@terra.com.br  and ask for information on the e-group  E-Theosophy.


00000000000000000000000000000000000000

The Aquarian Theosophist, November 2013

$
0
0
Volume XIV, Number 1





Dear Reader,

The opening quotation of the November edition says:   

“One must know oneself in order to be able to forget oneself.”

These are some of the topics approached in the “Aquarian”:  

*A Master, on Justice in Theosophy;

*The Victory of Light and Brotherhood;

*Resistance to Change in Theosophy (There’s a Price to Pay, in Psychological Obstacles);

*Theosophy and Social Questions;

*On Renouncing Expectations;

*Commentaries to the Golden Stairs (Observing Fourteen Ideas That Sum Up the Theosophical Path); and 

*A Lesson Learned During a Dream.

The 17 pp. edition closes with the List of New Texts in our Websites and a short fragment on the work of the Masters of the Wisdom.



0000000000000

You can find the whole collection of The Aquarian  Theosophist”  at   www.TheosophyOnline.com .


If you want to have access to a daily study of the original teachings of Theosophy, write to  lutbr@terra.com.brand ask for information on the e-group  E-Theosophy.


000000000000000000000000000000000000000

AUTOBIOGRAFIA Y OTROS ESCRITOS

$
0
0

Maine de Biran



Nota de la Edición Online de 2013

Aunque relativamente poco conocido, el pensador francés Maine de Biran (1766-1824) está entre los filósofos más importantes de la filosofia occidental en los siglos más recientes.   

Muerto siete años antes del nacimiento de Helena Blavatsky, Biran y su obra tienen especial interés para los teósofos, por su investigación sobre los varios principios o niveles de la consciencia humana.  Su vida entera fue  un ejercicio constante de contemplación y meditación,  mientras cumplía sus deberes como ciudadano. No son muy numerosos, quizá,  los que percibieron su verdadera profundidad.

El traductor Juan Segura Ruiz propone en el Prólogo un abordaje  mecanicista y simplón de la obra de Biran, pero hizo un buen trabajo de traducción para Editorial Aguilar.

(Carlos Cardoso Aveline, desde Portugal, en Noviembre 2013)




0000000000000

Maine de Birán nació el 29 de Noviembre de 1766, y murió el 20 de Julio de 1824.  

Visite siempre las sesiones en lengua española de www.Esoteric-Philosophy.com,   www.TheosophyOnline.com y  www.FilosofiaEsoterica.com.


0000000000000000000000000000000000

THE RESURGENCE OF PSEUDO-THEOSOPHY

$
0
0
Examining a Book Which Is
A Pot-Pourri of Truth and Lies


Jerome Wheeler


 The  idea of impartial Justice is a decisive factor in Theosophy


00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

The following article was first published at the
Canadian international magazine FOHAT in its Fall
2005 edition, pp. 58-59, and then at “The Aquarian
Theosophist”, in the edition dated December 2005,  
pages 14-16. The text makes an evaluation of the
book “The Esoteric World of Madame Blavatsky”,  
by Daniel Caldwell (Theosophical Publishing
House, T.P.H. / Quest Books, USA, 2000, 452 pp.).

Jerome Wheeler, the founding-editor of “The
Aquarian Theosophist” and a long-standing associate
of the United Lodge of Theosophists in Los Angeles,
presents here a fine examination of the editorial style
followed by those who attack both Theosophy and H.P.  
Blavatsky from inside the very theosophical movement.

(C. C. A.)

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000



The pot-pourri of lies and truth which Daniel Caldwell has served up to the public entitled “The Esoteric World of Madame Blavatsky”, needs a few comments to warn the unwary. This book has items by Emma Coulomb, Moncure D. Conway, Solovyoff, and Richard Hodgson scattered in its pages, usually WITH NO WARNING; as if this batch of known liars were presenting a truthful picture of Madame Blavatsky’s so-called milieu, or soirées.

Mr. Caldwell is very careful to tell us about what animated him, and uses H.P.B.’s advice as a cover for his policy:

“. . . Contrast alone can enable us to appreciate things at their right value; and unless a judge compares notes and hears both sides he can hardly come to a correct decision.” (H. P. Blavatsky, “The Theosophist”, July, 1881, p.218)

He even adds that he wants the reader to be able to compare notes and hear both sides. What is wrong with that?

Daniel is proud to say he “CHOSE” the enemies and liars found in his book; that moreover he did this as a way of creating contrast and thereby arriving at the truth.

But does the use of evidence in the book actually support this claim?

From the dust jacket onward the volume takes a parlor-game approach to Madame Blavatsky’s life. The reader is treated to phenomena, phenomena, and more phenomena until he is transformed into a veritable thaumaturgical sot, drunk on the wonders of his emotional thirst for marvels.

Emma Coulomb’s disgusting description of the Master is presented with the casual almost offhand comment that it was untrue. Then why present it!!

Again and again similar incidents of known liars are presented as they were respectable sources of evidence, though eventually proven untrue.

If you go to the biography “H. P. B. , The Extraordinary Life . . .”,by Sylvia Cranston, a heavily documented volume, and look up words like, Coulomb, Conway, Solovyoff, etc. you will see that Daniel Caldwell is using these insertions as a way of poisoning the well of available information, of destroying by innuendo - partly by what he uses for insertions, partly by what he chooses to leave out.

Remember, Daniel is presumably following H.P.B.’s advice that -

“Contrast alone can enable us to appreciate things at their right value; and unless a judge compares notes and hears both sides he can hardly come to a correct decision.”

OK, but is the reader getting an honest contrast, or a Hall of Mirrors?

If an editor inserts a single sentence in the beginning of his book that he will be presenting the views of both enemies and friends, but usually does NOTHING to say which is which as the items actually turn up, is the editor presenting contrast or confusion?

What about the readers? You who have read this book, have you found a page of philosophy? Has Daniel treated you to H.P.B.’s two-page article describing the rise and fall of phenomena as part of his contrast¸ so that you, the reader, can hear both sides?  In fact, good reader, did you run across any ethics? Did Daniel carefully leave out of his book those incidents of phenomena that would show CONTRAST, that would give another view of this Spiritual Teacher than that presented by the Conways and the Coulombs - something beyond growing tea-cups and catching letters?

What about the way Madame Blavatsky made her voyage to America? In steerage! In the 19th century only cattle, slaves and immigrants traveled steerage. Was it a normal nightmare, or an unusually bad one - this steerage trip?

According to Lloyd’s of London it was an unusually trying voyage. What about the reason she purchased her steerage ticket?

When purchasing her first-class ticket, H.P.B. noticed a woman in tears. On asking the problem she discovered that the lady had been sold bogus tickets. Thereupon H.P.B. exchanged her first-class ticket for steerage tickets for herself and the woman with children. Arriving in New York without money H.P.B. used her artistic talents to survive, making ties and artificial flowers.

The ethical CONTRAST is left in the shade. Hearing both sides is inconvenient when it lends wings to the eagle.

In fact, the greatest phenomena if you are thirsty for real occult phenomena rather than the type presented in this book is the Theosophical Philosophy. The 18 and plus books written and published by Madame Blavatsky in 15 years, saving millions of people from skeptical disbelief and the jungle of conflicting religions is a phenomenon of the first order.

Did Caldwell recount to you the mysterious phenomena that occurred when H.P.B. was forced out of India by the betrayal of Col. Olcott [1] and other fair-weather friends? On the voyage to Italy the Masters went into high gear on behalf of their betrayed, almost dead, but doggedly loyal AGENT. For you see, good reader, ingratitude is not one of their vices. Every morning sheaves of MSS [2] for the forthcoming Secret Doctrine were appearing on her work area - an area quite bare on retiring.

A book of this type does not create CONTRAST or aid one to hear both sides of the story. On the contrary, by ignoring the ethical and the philosophical, you create a poison stream for future pilgrims, and leave us in a HALL OF MIRRORS. Every circus has one. They are built by the misuse of contrast.

The dust jacket of “The Esoteric World of Madame Blavatsky”carries a quote from the well-known lecturer and editor Joy Mills, as one supporting its publication. If this is so, I can only conclude that she has not read the contents. If she has, are we to conclude that this past-president of the American T.S. supports the practice of mixing lies with truths? Mr. Algeo, the immediate past-president, has also issued a similar volume of lies mixed in with truths. Is this to be standard practice in the future for a Society whose motto is “There is no religion higher than Truth”?

Truth cannot be permanently stifled by such one-sided efforts. The transmission of real theosophy will continue as the new cycle gains strength with every passing day. The detractors may throw up a smoke-screen, BUT THEY CANNOT STOP IT. Those who planted the causative seed for this new beginning were far too wise to be hood-winked by the “money-changers.”

Mr. Crosbie pointed out, in one of his letters, this age-old process of destruction from within:

“The article made me think of the way the Jesuits side-tracked Masonry. They entered it, obtained its secrets, invented ‘higher degrees’ to draw attention from what lay hidden in the original ones, and gradually made it innocuous and incapable of leading to the knowledge that they feared. Much that is going on and has gone on in the . . . . . society has the appearance of leading into innocuous desuetude. This is the mode of working of Brahmano-Jesuitical forces, and the ordinary thinker is unable either to perceive, or credit it if warned. It is not believed that there are Dark Forces and their agents in the world, and that they war within that which they would destroy; that they dress themselves up in ‘sheep’s clothing’ so as to be unsuspected.” (“The Friendly Philosopher”, Theosophy Co., Los Angeles,  p. 161)

In the forthcoming volume (.....) [3] to be issued by the HPB Defense Fund,there will be a warning to serious students about such dishonest methods of slanting history to suit one’s own prejudices.


NOTES:

[1] Or in Colonel Olcott’s own words: “She kept urging me to take her to a judge, or solicitor, or barrister, no matter which, for her to file her affidavit and begin our action [against the Coulombs], but I positively refused (.....).  She fretted and stormed and insisted, but I would not stir from my position, and, when she threatened to go by herself and ‘wipe this stain off her character,’ I said that I should, in any case, resign my office and let the Convention decide between us.” (“Old Diary Leaves”, by Henry S. Olcott, T.P.H., India, third series, pp.  197-198.)

Vernon Harrison, of the Society of Psychical Research, summed up the betrayal most succinctly, a century later. In discussing the decision not to initiate a court case against the Coulombs, Dr. Harrison remarks that he cannot exonerate them [the delegates at the 1883 convention] from failing “to allow their founder [a] fair defense. They seemed concerned only with saving their own reputations. Whether she was impostor or not, HPB was entitled to a fair hearing. She never had it. Had she been allowed the legal and expert help she begged for, both Hodgson and the Society for Psychical Research would have been in dire trouble,” and the Coulombs too.  (“J’Accuse: An Examination of the Hodgson Report of 1885,” an essay by Vernon Harrison, at the “Journal of the Society for Psychical Research”, April 1986,  p. 309.) (J. W.)

[2] According to Dr. Hartmann and those traveling with her.  (J.W.)

[3] Note by the editor: We have updated this 2005 sentence. “Forthcoming volume”  is a reference to the book then intended as a defence of H. P. B., and which was published in September-October 2013 by “The Aquarian Theosophist” under the title of “The Fire and Light of Theosophical Literature”. (C. C. A.)

000000000000


On the defence of H. P. Blavatsky and the difference between truth and falsehood in the esoteric movement, see the book “The Fire and Light of Theosophical Literature”, by Carlos Cardoso Aveline.

Published in 2013 by The Aquarian Theosophist, the volume has 255 pages and can be obtained through  Amazon Books.
  
On Facebook, see the pages The Aquarian Theosophist  and  E-Theosophy.

  

If you want to have access to a daily study of the original teachings of Theosophy, write to  lutbr@terra.com.br  and ask for information on the e-group  E-Theosophy.


00000000000000000000000000000000000000

MÉMOIRE SUR LES PERCEPTIONS OBSCURES

$
0
0
Ou Sur les Impressions Générales
Affectives et les Sympathies en Particulier

Lu a la Société Médicale de Bergerac

Maine de Biran




MESSIEURS,

Dans l’institution de cette société savante la grande étude de l’homme, considéré sous ses divers rapports, s’offrit en première ligne comme l’objet le plus  relevé, le plus digne sans doute d’occuper des hommes, celui aussi vers lequel des membres, appelés à mettre en commun leurs connaissances acquises et leurs nouveaux efforts, étaient déjà accoutumés à diriger leurs méditations et toutes leurs observations pratiques.

J’eus l’honneur de le proclamer, Messieurs, dès  l’ouverture de cette Société, et je me plais à le répéter encore d’après le premier de vos maîtres, la nature humaine, sous quelque face qu’on la considère, ne peut se manifester  pleinement qu’à celui qui possède le système entier des connaissances physiologiques et médicales.  (......)




000000000000000


Join us on Facebook . Follow us on Twitter .

If you want to have access to a daily study of the original teachings of Theosophy, write to   lutbr@terra.com.br and ask for information on the e-group E-Theosophy.


00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

CONSCIOUSNESS AND SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS

$
0
0
How the Septenary Scale of 
States of Mind is Reflected in Our Hearts

A Unique, Unfinished Text of Great Value


Helena P. Blavatsky




A 2013 Editorial Note

Life has many a paradoxical aspect.  In the first decades of the 20th century, while
the main leaders of the Adyar Theosophical Society were dedicated to ritualistic farses and pseudo-clairvoyant nonsense, C. Jinarajadasa divided his time between supporting the delusions of his day and doing an active, serious research regarding the original teachings of theosophy.

His numerous editorial contributions to the authentic literature - and to the true history of the theosophical effort - include the publication of unique documents by H.P.B. like “The Original Programme”, or “Why I Do Not Return to India”,  and the 1900 Letter of a Master to A. Besant (of which he did not destroy the original copy, whose text  was later published  verbatim).

The following article is one more example of Mr. C. Jinarajadasa’s help to real esoteric philosophy. It consists of an unfinished draft by H.P.B., and was first published by C. J. in “The Theosophist”, Adyar, August 1925, pp. 632-634.  It was later included in “The Collected Writings of H.P. Blavatsky”, TPH, Volume XIII, pp. 288-289.

In theosophical parlance, one can say that there is a buddhic sense of things. In the present article H. P. Blavatsky says that “every one of the five [physical] recognized senses was primarily a mental sense”. H.P.B. is not alone in that. Irish-Scottish philosopher Francis Hutcheson (1694-1747) investigated the higher senses in human consciousness.  Hutcheson wrote about the moral sense present in human consciousness, and the sense of an ethical beauty. The idea belongs to the theosophy of all time and to the platonic tradition.

(Carlos Cardoso Aveline)

Consciousness and Self-Consciousness

Helena P. Blavatsky

The cycle of consciousness. It is argued that there cannot be more than one object of perception at a time before the soul because soul is a unit. Occultism teaches that simultaneously our conscious[ness] could receive no less than seven distinct impressions, and even pass them into memory.

This can be proved by striking at the same time seven keys of the scale of an instrument - say a piano. The 7 sounds will reach consciousness simultaneously; though the untrained consciousness may not be capable of registering them the first second, their prolonged vibrations will strike the ear in 7 distinct sounds one higher than the other in its pitch. All depends on training and attention. Thus the transference of a sensation from any organ to consciousness is almost instantaneous if your attention is fixed upon it; but if any noise distracts your attention it will take a number of seconds before it reaches consciousness.

The Occultist should train himself to receive and transmit along the line of the seven scales of his consciousness every impression or impressions simultaneously. He who reduces the intervals of physical time the most, has made the most progress.

The names and order of the 7 scales are:

1. Sense-perception;
2. Self-perception (or apperception);
3. Psychic apperception - which carries it to
4. Vital perception.

These are the four lower scales and belong to the psychophysical man. The[n] come

5. Manasic discernment;
6. Will perception and
7. Spiritual conscious apperception.

The special organ of consciousness is of course the brain, and is located in the aura of the pineal gland in the living man. During the process of mind or thought manifesting to consciousness, constant vibrations of light take place. If one could see clairvoyantly in the brain of a living man one could almost count (see with the eye) the seven shades of the successive scales of light, from the dullest to the brightest.

What consciousness is can never be defined psychologically. We can analyse and classify its work and effects - we cannot define it, unless we postulate an Ego distinct from the body. The septenary scale of states of consciousness is reflected in the heart, or rather its area [1], which vibrates and illumines the seven brains of the heart as it does the seven divisions or rays around the pineal gland.

This consc[iousness] shows to us the difference between the nature and essence of, say, astral body and Ego. One molecular, invisible unless condensed,  the other atomic-spiritual. (See example of smoker - ten cigarettes the smoke of each retaining its affinity.)

[The] Idea of Ego [is] the only one compatible with the facts of physiological observation. [2]

The mind or Ego, the subject of all and every state of consciousness is essentially a unity. The millions of various sub-states of consc[iousness] are a proof of the existence of this Ego. Even the brain cells furnish us with those states which affirm to us that there is an immortal soul etc.

Every one of the five recognized senses was primarily a mental sense. A fish born in a cave is blind - let it out into a river and it will begin to feel it sees, until gradually the physical organ of sight evolves and it will see. A deaf and dumb man hears internally, in his own way. Knowing, feeling, willing, [are] not faculties of [the] mind - [they are] its colleagues. [3]

[H. P. Blavatsky]

NOTES:

[1] Word difficult to decipher; may be intended for “aura,” though it looks like “area”. (C. Jinarajadasa) 

[2] For an easier understanding, I have inserted the two words in italics in square brackets in this sentence, and kept the capital “I” in “Idea”. (C. C. A.)

[3] For an easier understanding, I have inserted in this last sentence the commas and the four words between square brackets, in italics. (C. C. A.) 

000000000000000000


On the future of mankind and the victory of truth over falsehood in the esoteric movement, see the book “The Fire and Light of Theosophical Literature”, by Carlos Cardoso Aveline.

Published in 2013 by The Aquarian Theosophist, the volume has 255 pages and can be obtained through Amazon Books.
  
On Facebook, see the pages The Aquarian Theosophist  and  E-Theosophy.

  

If you want to have access to a daily study of the original teachings of Theosophy, write to  lutbr@terra.com.br  and ask for information on the e-group  E-Theosophy.


00000000000000000000000000000000000000

DIFENDENDO LA VECCHIA SIGNORA

$
0
0
 Un commentario su “The Letters of H.P. Blavatsky – Vol. I” Edito da John Algeo, TPH-Wheaton, USA, 2003, 632 pp.

Carlos Cardoso Aveline



   Facsimile della Lettera risalente al 2004 della Sig.ra Burnier che dice di non aver
niente a che fare con linclusione delle lettere ovviamente spurienel volume della TPH-USA.


00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Il testo che segue riproduce il Capitolo Diciotto del
libro “The Fire and Light of Theosophical
Literature
”, di Carlos Cardoso Aveline, The
Aquarian Theosophist, Portugal, 255 pp., 2013.

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Incluse nel libro “The Letters of H.P. Blavatsky – Volume I” possiamo trovare circa 27 lettere che si dice siano state scritte da HPB, ma di cui non apparvero mai gli originali. Queste lettere contengono numerosi attacchi brutali e calunnie contraffatte contro la principale fondatrice del movimento esoterico moderno.

In molti casi, le false lettere attribuite a Helena P. Blavatsky furono ottenute esclusivamente tramite la loro pubblicazione operata dal Sig. Vsevolod S. Solovyov, come l
editore John Algeo indica giustamente dopo il testo di ognuna di esse.

Il Sig. John Algeo, che era al tempo il vice-presidente internazionale della Società Teosofica di Adyar, adottò i documenti di Solovyov come “veri” o “probabilmente veri”. Nel fare questo, egli preferì non prendere in considerazione il fatto centrale che Solovyov fu un ben noto calunniatore ed un notevole nemico pubblico del movimento Teosofico e di HPB, personalmente. Algeo ignorò anche il fatto che non ci sono indicazioni alcune che suggeriscono che questi testi potrebbero essere autentici.

Nessuno storico teosofico dà credito a Vsevolod Solovyov. Le sue accuse sono completamente false, come Sylvia Cranston dimostra nel libro “HPB, The Extraordinary Life & Influence of Helena Blavatsky”.[1]

In un altro libro importante - “Blavatsky and Her Teachers” – Jean Overton Fuller riporta che Solovyov contraffece e pubblicò parecchie lettere, che lui attribuì ad HPB. In una di quelle, Solovyov fa “confessare” HPB che lei “inventò” l
intera idea dei Maestri.[2]

In una terza biografia ben conosciuta della Vecchia Signora, “When Daylight Comes”, di Howard Murphet, leggiamo – a pagina 193 - che Solovyov giocò il ruolo di un “giornalista proteso verso scandali e corruzione e che era in cerca di una buona storia a qualsiasi costo della verità”.[3] Nella stessa pagina 193, Howard Murphet cita H. S. Olcott, il presidente fondatore della Società Teosofica. Secondo HSO, il fatto che i testi di Solovyov contro HPB vennero pubblicati solo dopo la morte di lei, fatto che “lo rese sicuro nel dire le sue menzogne sul suo conto, dimostra quanto è crudele e spregevole, sebbene cinquanta volte più talentuoso, rispetto ai Coulomb”.[4]

John Algeo, che sembrava essere un attento linguista e studioso, venne meno nel lasciare impubblicate queste lettere. E venne meno persino nel menzionare che il Sig. Solovyov, unica sola fonte di questi testi, fu uno dei più acerrimi nemici di HPB e del movimento teosofico in tutti i tempi e che molto probabilmente contraffece queste lettere, completamente od in parte. Infatti, Algeo sembra implicitamente indicare al lettore che le lettere sono autentiche. Il nome stesso della Theosophical Publishing House che appare sul volume, e il fatto che è pubblicato come parte dei Collected Writings di HPB attribuiscono ancor più peso alla falsa impressione che queste lettere debbano essere prese come autentiche.

La maggior parte delle Algeo-Solovyov-lettere sono indirizzate al Sig. A. N. Aksakoff. Oltre ai testi commentati sotto, altre lettere incluse nel volume della U.S.A.-TPH sono state ottenute esclusivamente dal libro del Sig. Vsevolod Solovyov.

Tra i testi falsi pubblicati come autentici ci sono le lettere-Algeo 7, 11, 12, 17, 33, 37, 45, 53, 54, 55, 60, 61, 69, 70, 72, 76, 85, 90 e 94. Alcune delle “Lettere” più offensive nel volume sono la 7, 12, 17, 33, 37, 53, 69 e 76. Ma in diverse altre Algeo-Solovyov-lettere HPB appare come qualcuno ossessionato dal denaro, una persona meschina, moralmente ed intellettualmente limitata ad argomenti di scarsa importanza.

Commentari su alcuni dei testi nel libro “Letters of H.P. Blavatsky - volume I”:

Lettera 7– In questo testo, famoso per essere una collezione di assurdità, HPB viene fatta offrire i suoi servigi alla Polizia Segreta Russa. Una completa indagine della Algeo-Lettera numero 7 viene presentata nel prossimo Capitolo, “Un Capolavoro di Contraffazione Editoriale”.

Lettera 8– Serve come una preparazione per leggere le Algeo-Lettere 11 e 12.

Lettere 11 e 12– La “HPB” fabbricata dai nemici del movimento esoterico scrive come se lei fosse moralmente colpevole per ogni tipo di comportamento ignobile. Una delle frasi nella Algeo-Lettera 12, a pagina 49, recita: “Questi sono i frutti più amari della mia giovinezza consacrata a Satana, ai suoi fasti e alle sue opere!”

A pagina 47, Lettera 12, lei scrive: “Sebbene tu abbia il diritto, come ogni uomo rispettabile, di disprezzarmi per la mia triste reputazione nel passato, sei così condiscendente e magnanimo nello scrivermi. …. Se ho una qualche speranza per il futuro, questa c
è solo dopo la tomba, quando lucenti spiriti mi aiuteranno a liberarmi dal mio involucro peccaminoso ed impuro.”

Ci sono molte altre proposizioni attribuite ad HPB che sono estremamente difficili da prendere per vere se non ridicolmente false.

Le Algeo-Lettere 11, 12 ,17 ed altre, possono essere complete falsificazioni. Un
altra possibilità è che interpolazioni false siano state incluse nelle loro “trascrizioni” fatte dal Sig. Solovyov. Sia da unevidenza interna e sia dalla fonte di queste lettere, è facile notare che esse includono molte proposizioni false.

Nel libro “Blavatsky and Her Teachers”, Jean Overton Fuller identifica correttamente la falsa lettera che Algeo pubblicò come autentica e che incluse nel suo volume come Lettera 11. Qui “HPB” viene fatta parlare sull
amore libero e viene fatta dire che “non cè salvezza” per lei “eccetto la morte”.

Nel 1999, sentii che questa lettera sarebbe stata pubblicata come parte dei “Collected Writings”. Il Sig. Pedro Oliveira, il passato Segretario Internazionale della S.T. di Adyar, mi disse questo. Al tempo, scrissi alla USA-TPH chiedendo informazioni su un
eventuale continuazione dei “Collected Writings” dopo il Volume XV – Indice Cumulativo. Ebbi una risposta che diceva che non era in preparazione alcun altro volume. Nellanno 2000, quando individuai dei rumours nella Sezione Brasiliana della S.T. che mettevano in discussione la purezza della vita di HPB, scrissi a Pedro Oliveira per una chiarificazione ed evitò largomento.

Lettera 17– In questo testo la falsa “HPB”, una bambola vudùastrale creata per causare danno alla missione della reale Monade che un tempo lavorò sotto il nome di HPB, viene fatta affermare: “Se senti che la Blavatsky dei molti peccati è perita, non nel fiore degli anni e della bellezza, per una qualche morte curiosa, e che si è dematerializzata per sempre...” (pagina 71). E poi attacca la sua propria famiglia (pagina 72).

Lettera 33– Queste parole vengono attribuite a lei: “... eppure, c
è una sola cosa che sto cercando di fare e sto lottando per ottenerla – che la gente dovrebbe dimenticare la prima Blavatsky e lasciare quella nuova da sola. Ma sembra difficile da ottenere.” E il testo va avanti in questa guisa.

Lettera 37– Questa Algeo-Lettera dice: “In una descrizione dettagliata (…..), Olcott fa di me qualcosa di misteriosamente terribile, e quasi induce il pubblico a sospettare o che ho venduto la mia anima al demonio o che sono la diretta erede del Conte di Saint-Germain o Cagliostro. Non credeteci (…..).” Nella stessa pagina, poche linee più sotto: “Per di più lo spirito di John King mi vuole molto bene, e gli voglio molto più bene di ogni cosa sulla terra. Lui è il mio unico amico, e se sono debitrice verso qualcuno per il cambiamento radicale nelle mie idee di vita, nelle mie aspirazioni, e così via, è grazie a lui soltanto.”

Ed in seguito, possiamo leggere:

“Questo è il motivo per cui ho stabilito la regola di non permettere mai in alcun caso agli estranei di utilizzare i miei poteri medianici.” (pp. 141-142)

Lettera 53–  “Sono pronta a vendere la mia anima per lo spiritismo, ma nessuno la comprerà, e sto vivendo alla giornata ...” (pagina 194)

Lettera 69– “Davvero non posso andare e fare ora a pezzi il mio stomaco come un suicida Giapponese, solo perché il demonio mi ha messo in difficoltà nella mia giovinezza...” Ed anche: “La mia posizione è squallida – semplicemente impotente. Non è rimasto altro che partire per l
Australia e cambiare il mio nome per sempre.” (pagina 260)

Lettera 76– Tra altre assurdità Algeotiche, la fondatrice del movimento teosofico viene fatta descrivere una scena in cui lei ed altre persone torturano un gatto e causano la morte dell
animale per elettrificazione (pagina 288), durante “unesperienza occulta”.

Nella prefazione di questo volume con le “Letters of HPB”, John Algeo rivela prudentemente aspetti minori dei suoi “Princìpi Editoriali” su questioni come i Riferimenti, la Traslitterazione, le Traduzioni e l
Ordine. Egli non dice che include unintera collezione di calunnie contro HPB.

Il titolo stesso del volume di Algeo - “The Letters of H.P. Blavatsky” - invita il lettore a dare per scontato che tutte le Lettere sono state autenticamente scritte da HPB. Qualsiasi onestoapproccio editoriale dovrebbe per lo meno menzionare che queste non possono essere attribuite ad HPB, e che molte di esse sono state contraffatte o distorte dal Sig. Solovyov. 

Si deve prendere in considerazione il fatto che queste lettere sono tutte datate dopo il 1870, quando una lettera dai Mahatma, spedita alla zia di HPB, specificò chiaramente che HPB era già in pieno contatto con loro e che era un discepolo completo.[5] Perciò nessuno potrebbe dire che quando HPB scrisse queste lettere lei era ingenua, che non era stata accettata nel discepolato correttamente, etc.

Naturalmente, i membri del “Consiglio Editoriale per il volume The Letters of HPB” - Dara Eklund, Daniel Caldwell, R. Elwood, Joy Mills, Nicholas Weeks – hanno un grado di responsabilità riguardo alla pubblicazione di queste calunnie. In una lettera a me indirizzata, datata 6 Giugno 2004, il Sig. Algeo dice che ad ogni membro della Commissione Editoriale “venne spedito tutto il materiale come era stato preparato”, ed ogni membro “reagì a quel materiale, senza menzionare le questioni della sua preoccupazione.”

Questo, tuttavia, non è vero, come la Sig.ra Dara Eklund mi disse in una lettera datata 17 Maggio 2004:

“Mio marito Nicholas Weeks aveva avvertito Algeo riguardo le lettere di Solovyov, ma lui ha compiuto la decisione finale...”

Dara mi mandò copia di una e-mail indirizzata da John Algeo a lei, scritta nel Maggio 2004 dopo aver ricevuto la mia prima lettera indirizzata a lui e a Dara. Nella e-mail Algeo afferma:

“La questione dell
attendibilità di Solovyov mi è già stata portata allattenzione da Leslie Price, quindi ce lho in mente. Vedrò se posso preparare un qualche ammonimento generale nella prossima stampa, e più note specifiche sui suoi [“his”; di Solovyov. N.d.T. ] particolari fallimenti nella prossima edizione. Ero naturalmente cosciente che Solovyov (come altri che hanno citato o estratto le lettere di HPB) non può essere preso per buono, e nel volume cè un
ʼaffermazione generale su questo. Ma siccome Boris incluse quelle lettere nella sua collezione, non sono stato abbastanza critico su di esse quanto avrei dovuto probabilmente esserlo.” 

In questo paragrafo John Algeo accenna ai “fallimenti particolari” di Solovyov.

Secondo il Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary, “fallimento” significa “latto o lo stato di colui o di qualcosa che fallisce”. Perciò fallimenti non è la parola per ciò che il Sig. Solovyov fece. Egli provò ad arrecare danno e capitò di avere davvero un considerevole successo. Persino ora le sue bugie sono pubblicizzate.

Si può sostenere che molte di queste lettere vennero tradotte da Boris de Zirkoff, che le incluse nella sua cartella personale decine di anni fa.

Ma ciò non significa che Zirkoff pensò che erano autentiche. Boris pubblicò altre accuse false e lettere contraffatte contro HPB nel volume VI dei suoi Collected Writings. Egli fece questo identificando chiaramente i testi come falsificazioni, dai loro stessi titoli, ed incluse commentari sinceri di HPB stessa su tali diffamazioni. Nessuna ambiguità era possibile. Nessun lettore potrebbe assolutamente pensare che quei testi contraffatti siano veri. E invece Algeo adottò silenziosamente come veri gli attacchi contro HPB. È chiaro, perciò, che vi è una distanza oceanica tra i due approcci editoriali in riguardo agli attacchi contro la Vecchia Signora.

In una lettera ad Algeo, datata 25 Maggio 2004, sottoposi a lui 12 domande tecniche:

1) Che prove ha per stabilire che le lettere di Solovyov, i cui originali non apparvero mai, sono vere?

2) Perché crede implicitamente, come editore, che Solovyov è una fonte storica attendibile?

3) Chi fece la scoperta storica che Henry S. Olcott, Jean Overton Fuller, Howard Murphet, Sylvia Cranston e molti altri studenti si sono sbagliati, mentre il Sig. Solovyov è, dopo tutto, una fonte attendibile di documenti che riguardano H.P. Blavatsky?

4) Quali sono le prove scientifiche che corroborano tale formidabile scoperta?

5) O accetta le prove che Solovyov è un bugiardo ed un traditore della Verità?

6) Ma poi, perché pubblicare il suo materiale come vero senza alcun avvertimento?

7) O piuttosto, perché proprio pubblicarlo?

8) Chi diede la lettera attribuita ad H.P.B. e pubblicata come numero 7, ai Pubblici Archivi Russi dove si trova ora?

9) Deve avere prove o testimonianze che gli originali della Lettera 7, ora in questi Pubblici
Archivi, non furono contraffatte né dal Sig. Solovyov né dal Sig. e dalla Sig.ra Coulomb.

10) Quali sono queste prove e testimonianze, per favore?

11) Qualche esperto in contraffazioni ha esaminato questi “originali”?

12) Ricordi per favore che l
ultima volta che un esperto esaminò le cosiddette “prove”
contro HPB, la Vecchia Signora non venne proclamata colpevole. HPB venne dichiarata
vittima di falsificazioni, e la SPR, la Società per le Ricerche Psichiche, ha onestamente porto pubbliche scuse nell
Aprile 1986, un centinaio di anni dopo aver condannato HPB su false prove. Perché non sentire un buon esperto in contraffazioni per la Lettera 7, se ciò non è stato ancora fatto?

Mentre queste 12 domande a John Algeo non ricevettero risposte, la presidente internazionale della Società Teosofica (Adyar) mi scriveva onestamente sulla questione. Per comprendere cosa stava accadendo con le politiche editoriali della Società di Adyar, avevo chiesto una spiegazione dalla Sig.ra Radha Burnier. Su ricezione della mia valutazione del lavoro editoriale di Algeo, lei rispose in una lettera datata 24 Giugno 2004:

“Sono d
accordo riguardo la saggezza di includere nel volume ‘The Letters of HPB’ pubblicato dalla TPH Wheaton le lettere ovviamente spurie. Deve chiedere una spiegazione, non da me (che non ho niente a che fare con ciò, e su cui non sono stata consultata) ma dalla Commissione Editoriale negli Stati Uniti.”

È un fatto significativo che la Sig.ra Burnier sta lontano da questi attacchi contro HPB.

In una lettera personale a me diretta e datata 5 Maggio 2004, Jean Overton Fuller ammise:
“È molto strano, essendo Algeo un Teosofo e in più Vice-Presidente.” Nella stessa lettera Jean dice che la pubblicazione delle lettere di Solovyov come se fossero autentiche è qualcosa di “realmente molto nocivo”.

Algeo ha accettato parzialmente di aver commesso un errore nel pubblicare le lettere di Solovyov. Ma la sua confessione venne fatta privatamente, e tale errore pubblico deve essere corretto pubblicamente, come gli chiesi in una lettera datata 19 Giugno 2004:

Non sarebbe certamente equo che la disinformazione raggiungesse la moltitudine, e che l
ammissione onesta dellerrore fosse fatta solamente ad una o due persone. Lei sa che le testate giornalistiche moderne sono solite ammettere i loro errori. Quando una qualsiasi pubblicazione compie un errore, segue la regola (ed in molti casi lo stabilisce la legge) che il riconoscimento e la correzione dovrebbero essere tanto pubbliche quanto la disinformazione pubblicizzata. Nel mondo religioso, persino il Papa Giovanni Paolo II ha ammesso pubblicamente diversi dei crimini passati del Vaticano contro gli Ebrei, i popoli nativi, durante lInquisizione, etc.”

“Perciò vorrei dare un consiglio. Potrebbe fare per favore una nota od un annuncio pubblico (nella rivista ʻQuestʼ, per esempio), abbastanza visibile da essere notato, ammettendo che le lettere di Solovyov – una volta esaminate completamente le prove disponibili– non possono essere considerate autentiche, ma proprio l
opposto, dal momento che sono state probabilmente contraffatte?”

“Se farà questo, non mi sentirò obbligato a provare a costruire una mole di coscienza critica generale sulla questione, in modo che nella seconda edizione gli errori saranno corretti.”

“Non ho l
opzione di non fare alcuna cosa per la questione, a meno che qualcuno mi dimostri che Solovyov sia una fonte affidabile sulla storia teosofica e sulla vita di HPB. La ragione per cui non posso rimanere inerte è che ho un profondo dovere etico nel praticare una valorosa difesa di coloro che sono ingiustamente attaccati. (Credo che lei abbia dimestichezza con questo particolare gradino delle Scale Dorate.) ”

Algeo scrisse di fare delle correzioni nella prossima edizione. Non c
è alcun bisogno per un tale lungo ritardo nella correzione dellerrore compiuto. Tale futura correzione lascerebbe lintera prima edizione nellerrore. Daltra parte, non cè alcuna garanzia che una seconda edizione apparirà presto, come la Sig.ra Joy Mills, membro del Consiglio Editoriale, ammise in una lettera a me indirizzata, datata 5 Agosto 2004:

“Siamo grati della sua preoccupazione su qualsiasi lettera che possa essere spuria, nell
opera pubblicata sotto il titolo ‘The Letters of H.P. Blavatsky’. Le correzioni possono solo essere fatte se e quando ci sarà una prossima edizione di questo primo volume delle lettere. Nel frattempo, le assicuro che prenderemo in considerazione i suoi diversi commenti ed obiezioni.”

È un problema matematico piuttosto difficile da risolvere per me comprendere perché la Sig.ra Joy Mills (una ex vice-presidente internazionale della Società di Adyar) debba arrivare alla conclusione che “niente possa essere fatto” prima che si verifichi il “se e il quando” di una nuova edizione. La vera domanda è: “seppure ci fosse al più presto un
altra edizione, perché aspettare per fare la correzione?” Scrissi il 9 Luglio 2004 a Dara Eklund, con copia al Sig. Algeo:

“Perché aspettare? Perché dovremmo far circolare (…..) falsità – per mezzo di azioni od omissioni – tra le due o le tre migliaia di lettori della prima edizione (....). Perché non creare un
errata corrige, un foglio con una rettifica, che circolerebbe con ogni nuovo volume che verrà venduto? (…..) Sarebbe un (…..) atteggiamento adeguato e professionale da parte del Sig. John Algeo e del suo Consiglio.”

Ed aggiunsi nella stessa lettera:

“...Una volta che il Sig. Algeo avrà una chiara percezione dell
ingiustizia fatta ad HPB, egli sarà felice di riconoscere lo sbaglio il più presto possibile, come ogni editore capace ed esperto fa oggi nel mondo. In lettere precedenti ho già menzionato le scuse del Vaticano riguardo a diversi dei suoi crimini. Ho anche menzionato la saggia tradizione di unerrata corrige e delle scuse editoriali che gli editori fanno apertamente quando si ritiene necessaria. (….) Ma credo che sarai daccordo con me che uno sbaglio pubblico non può essere corretto con una rettifica riservata.”


La Psicoanalisi di una Politica Editoriale

In una cartolina scritta a mano datata 19 Luglio 2004, Dara Eklund mi ripeté che a suo parere tutta la responsabilità editoriale appartiene al Sig. John Algeo e disse che davvero “egli non avrebbe bisogno di aspettare dieci anni per fare questo” [ovvero, le correzioni]. [6]

La pazienza dovrebbe essere praticata nella filosofia esoterica, insieme alla fermezza. Diversi anni dopo il commentario di Dara, l
edizione di Gennaio 2013 della rivista The Aquarian Theosophist fece la stessa proposta nell’articolo intitolato “H.P.B. Defense Project – 2013, an Opportunity to Change for the Better” (pp. 3-4). Non si verificò ancora alcuna reazione positiva.

In un articolo pubblicato nell’edizione di Luglio 2005 della rivista di Adyar “The Theosophist”, Algeo aveva ammesso: “Può essere il caso che quelle lettere siano davvero falsificazioni.”[7] Ma non ammise che quelle sono chiaramentefraudolente, e che non ha alcuna minima prova del contrario.

Come potrebbero razionalmente spiegarsi le azioni di Algeo? Qual è il proposito conscio od inconscio di sminuire HPB? Possono esserci profondi processi psicologici coinvolti. Riconoscere il fatto basilare della purezza di vita di HPB comporta implicazioni che costituiscono un compito impegnativo per alcuni. Se hai un leader spirituale che condusse una vita pura, provi a purificare te stesso, le tue emozioni e le tue intenzioni il più possibile. Per coloro che non sono interessati a questo compito difficile ma principale, immaginare che HPB abbia condotto una vita impura può essere una falsa causa di conforto e di sollievo. Le bugie di Solovyov possono quindi aiutare queste persone lungo il sentiero inizialmente ampio e piacevole di auto-giustificazione, auto-indulgenza ed auto-illusione.

La purezza di vita di HPB ha poco a che fare con il moralismo convenzionale o popolare, che è normalmente attaccato ad un certo grado di ipocrisia. L
autodisciplina e la purezza di vita per sinceri aspiranti alla saggezza hanno a che fare con lo Yoga come scienza.

La ragione per i teosofi di seguire l
esempio di HPB e di provare a condurre vite pure ha a che fare con la Scienza Occulta e con il processo di causa ed effetto. È essenziale, lungo il 21° secolo ed in seguito, che le persone abbiano la possibilità di comprendere che gli Insegnamenti dei Mahatma giunsero attraverso una persona onesta, una Jnana Yogi, una Upasika, un discepolo femmina.

La conoscenza sacra è unita – non per ragioni religiose, ma per ragioni scientifiche – ad una vita pulita, ad una mente aperta, ad un cuore puro, ad un leale senso del dovere verso l
Insegnante, ad una coraggiosa dichiarazione di princìpi e ad una valorosa difesa di coloro che sono ingiustamente attaccati. Questi non sono che alcuni dei fondamentali gradini indicati dai Mahatma a coloro che vogliono essere sinceri aspiranti al discepolato laico. [8]


NOTE:

[1] In Inglese: “HPB, The Extraordinary Life & Influence of Helena Blavatsky”, di Sylvia Cranston, pubblicato da Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam Books, N.Y., USA, 1994, 648 pp. Vedi Capitolo 2 nella Parte 6, pp. 298-310.
In Italiano: “Helena Blavatsky – La Straordinaria Vita e il Pensiero della Fondatrice del Movimento Teosofico Moderno” pubblicato da Armenia. Vedi Capitolo 2 nella Parte 6, pp. 305-315.

[2]“Blavatsky and Her Teachers”, della Sig.ra Jean Overton Fuller, East-West Publications, 1988, 270 pp., vedi Capitolo 67, pp. 186-188.

[3]“When Daylight Comes”, di Howard Murphet, TPH, Quest Books, USA, copyright 1975, 277 pp. Vedi Capitolo 22, pp. 191-194.

[4] La frase è estratta da “Old Diary Leaves” di H.S. Olcott, TPH-India, 1972, volume III, p. 185.

[5] Vedi “Letters From the Masters of the Wisdom”, edito da C. Jinarajadasa, TPH, 1973, Seconda Serie, Lettera 1, dal Mahatma K.H.

[6] Il presente Capitolo esamina solo pochi degli sbagli fondamentali e delle forme di mancanza di rispetto alla verità e all
etica nel volume di Algeo. Per altri errori nel lavoro editoriale di “The Letters of H.P. Blavatsky – Vol. I”, vedi l’esamina di John Patrick Deveney, da New York, nella rivista “Theosophical History” del Luglio 2004, pp. 31-36. “Theosophical History” venne pubblicata dal Sig. James Santucci, Department of Comparative Religion, California State University, USA.

[7]“Discord is the Harmony of the Universe”, un articolo di John Algeo nel “The Theosophist”, una rivista mensile, Adyar, India, Luglio 2005, vedi p. 371.

[8] Il Capitolo di cui sopra è una versiona ampliata ed aggiornata di un testo pubblicato sotto lo stesso titolo dalla rivista “Fohat” nella sua edizione dell’Inverno 2004. Venne anche pubblicato nel “The Aquarian Theosophist”, Settembre 2005, pp. 1-9. Una traduzione in lingua Portoghese della sua versione iniziale venne pubblicata in Portogallo dalla rivista “Biosofia” nell’edizione dell’Inverno 2004-2005.

0000000000000000000000000



Il libro “The Fire and Light of Theosophical Literature” può essere acquistato su Amazon Books tramite questi indirizzi:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/9892039971 (Amazon.com),
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/9892039971 (Amazon.UK),
http://www.amazon.fr/gp/product/9892039971 (Amazon.FR) e http://www.amazon.it/gp/product/9892039971 (Amazon.IT). Il volume si può trovare in Amazon Libri attraverso il nome dell’autore.

Su Facebook, vedi le pagine The Aquarian Theosophist e The Fire and Light of Theosophical Literature.

Traduzione Italiana a cura di Marco Bufarini. Data di pubblicazione in Italiano: Novembre 2013.

Visita sempre www.Esoteric-Philosophy.com , www.TheosophyOnline.com  e 
www.FilosofiaEsoterica.com  .


Se desideri accedere ad uno studio giornaliero degli insegnamenti originali della Teosofia in lingua Inglese, scrivi a lutbr@terra.com.bre chiedi informazioni sull e-gruppo E-Theosophy.

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

WHEREIN IS LOVE, THEREIN IS GOD

$
0
0
A Christian Story, Translated From 
Russian Language by H. P. Blavatsky



Leo Tolstoy

  


           

00000000000000000000000000000000

The following story is reproduced
from “Lucifer” magazine, December
1889 edition, pp. 310-318. It was also
published at “The Aquarian Theosophist”,
October 2003, pp. 12-20. The word “Lucifer”
means “light-bearer” and refers to the planet Venus,
“the star that brings the new day”. This ancient term
has been distorted by misinformed Christian Theologians.

(C.C.A.)

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000



Once there dwelt in a city a bootmaker, Martin Avdeyitch. He lived in a small basement room with one window. The window looked on the street. Through the window one could see the people passing; though their legs alone could be seen, yet Martin Avdeyitch used to recognise the owners by their boots.

Martin Avdeyitch had lived in his room for a long while and had many acquaintances. Rare was that pair of boots in the neighbourhood that missed his hands. Some he soled, others he patched, some again he trimmed afresh, putting on occasionally a new heel or two. And often he used to see his work through the window. Of orders he had plenty, for Avdeyitch’s work was solid; he always furnished good material, putting on it no higher price than he should, and stuck punctually to his promises. Whenever sure of being ready at the time fixed, he would accept an order; if otherwise, he would never deceive a customer, but would warn him beforehand. So Avdeyitch became known and had no end of work. Avdeyitch had always been a good man, but toward old age he took to thinking more of his soul and approaching nearer his God. In the now old days, when Martin yet lived as a journeyman, he had lost his wife. A boy about three years old had been all that remained of her. Their elder children had all died.

At first Martin thought of sending his boy to the village, to live with his sister, but pitying the child, he changed his mind - “too hard for my Kapitoshka to grow up in a strange family”, he said to himself, “I’ll keep him with me.” Asking his master to discharge him, Avdeyitch went to live together with his little boy in a lodging. But God had not given him luck with children. Hardly had the child grown up sufficiently to be of help to his father, than he fell sick, burnt with fever for a week, and died. Martin buried his son and fell into despair. So much did he despair that he murmured against God. Such weariness got hold of Martin that more than once he implored God for death, and reproved Him for not taking him, an old man, instead of his beloved and only son. Avdeyitch even ceased to go to Church. Once an old village neighbour visited Avdeyitch, on his way from Troitza Monastery - a pilgrim in the eighth year of his travels. After conversing awhile Avdeyitch complained to him about his sorrows. “No desire, man of God, do I feel for life”, he said. “Death alone do I covet, and pray God for. Here am I, a hopeless man in all?”

And the Pilgrim answered:

“Thou speakest not well, Martin, for it behoves us not to judge the acts of God. It is not as we fancy but as God decrees! And if God so willed that thy son should die and thou shouldst live, therefore must it have been for the best. As to thy despairing, this is only because thou seekest to live for thine own comfort alone.”

“And for what else should one live?” asked Martin.

Quoth the old man: “For God, Martin, thou shouldst live for God. He giveth life, for Him then we should live. Once thou livest for God, thou shalt cease fretting, and life shall seem to thee but a light burden.”

After a short silence, Martin asked: 

“How should one live for God?”

Saith the old one: “As for this, Christ Himself showeth us the way. Canst thou not read? Well, buy the Evangels and read them, and thou shalt learn therein how one can live for God. It is all there.”

And these words found their way into Martin’s heart. And he went and bought a New Testament, in large print, and set himself to study it.

Avdeyitch had intended to read only on holidays, but no sooner had he begun, than he felt his soul so overjoyed that he read daily. At times he would go on reading so late at night that the oil in his lamp would be all burned out, and he still unable to tear himself away from the book. Thus Avdeyitch read every evening. And the more he read, the more it became clear to him what God expected of him, and how one should live for God; and he felt the burden on his heart becoming lighter and lighter. Hitherto when retiring to rest, he used to begin groaning and moaning for his Kapitoshka, but now his last thoughts became, “Glory to Thee,  glory, O Lord! Thy will be done.”

And now all the life of Avdeyitch was changed. Hitherto, as a Sunday offering, he used to visit the inn, to get a glass of tea, and to occasionally indulge in liquor. He, too, had drunk with casual friends; and though never enough to get drunk, yet often retired in too good humour, talking nonsense, and even shouting to, and abusing people on his way home.

But now all this had gone by; his life had become quiet and full of contentment. From morn till eve at work; and when the task was done, taking his little lamp from the hook on the wall, placing it on his table, and then getting his book from the shelf, opening it, and sitting down to read. And the more he read, the better he understood it and the lighter and happier he felt in his heart.

Once, it so happened that Martin sat up later than usual. He was reading the Gospel according to St. Luke. He had read the sixth chapter, and had come upon the verses: “And unto him that smiteth thee on the one cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloak forbid not to take thy shirt [1] also. Give to every man that asketh of thee; and of him that taketh away thy goods ask them not again. And as ye would that men should do to you, do ye also to them likewise.” Then he read those verses wherein the Lord saith:

“And why call ye me, Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say? Whosoever cometh to me, and heareth my sayings and doeth them, I will show you to whom he is like: He is like a man which built an house, and digged deep, and laid the foundation on a rock; and when the flood arose, the stream beat vehemently upon that house, and could not shake it: for it was founded upon a rock. But he that heareth, and doeth not, is like a man that without a foundation built an house upon the sand; against which the stream did beat vehemently, and immediately it fell; and the ruin of that house was great.”

Read Avdeyitch these words and his soul felt overjoyed. Taking off his spectacles, he laid them on the book before him, and leaning on the table fell into deep thought. He tried to fit his life to the precepts. And then he asked himself:

“Is my house built on rock or on sand? If on rock, well and good. Aye, it is easy enough, sitting here alone to fancy that one has done everything as God commands; but forget this for a moment and there’s sin again. Nevertheless, I’ll try. Too good, not to - and may God help me!”

Thus ran his thoughts; he half rose to go to bed, but felt unwilling yet to part with the Book. So he went on reading the seventh Chapter. He read about the centurion, read all about the son of the widow, read the reply to John’s disciples and came to that place, where a Pharisee asked Jesus to eat with him; and finally read how the woman “which was a sinner” anointed His feet and washed them with her tears and how He forgave her sins. At last he came to verse 44 and began to read: “And he turned to the woman, and said unto Simon, Seest thou this woman? I entered into thine house, thou gavest me no water for my feet; but she hath washed my feet with her tears, and wiped them with the hairs of her head; and since the time I came in, she hath not ceased to kiss my feet. My head with oil thou didst not anoint; but she hath anointed my feet with ointment.” And having read these verses he repeated to himself: “Gave no water for the feet, gave no kiss, nor did he anoint His head with oil….”

He took off his spectacles once more, placed them on the Book, and fell into deep thought again.

“That Pharisee, there, must have been one of my sort. I too never used to remember anyone but myself: how to indulge in tea, to sit in warmth and comfort, and no thought of others. Thought of himself only; as to his guest, no care did he feel for him. And who, that guest? Why the Lord Himself. Would He but come to me now, could I ever act as he did?”

Placing both arms on the table, Avdeyitch fell unconsciously into a half slumber.         

“Martin!” he suddenly heard, as if something had breathed near his ear.

Startled in his sleep, “Who’s here?” he cried.

Turning round he looked at the door - and saw no one. He fell asleep again. Suddenly he heard distinctly a voice saying:

“Martin, I say, Martin! look out on the street to-morrow for me. I will come.”

Then Martin awoke, arose from his chair and began to rub his eyes, not sure whether he had really heard these words, or only dreamed them. Then he turned off his lamp, and took to his bed.

On the morrow Avdeyitch arose before twilight, said his prayers, kindled his fire, put his stshy [2] and kasha [3] into the oven, made his samovar boil [4], donned his apron, and taking his seat under the window commenced his work. There sat Avdeyitch, working, but thinking all the while of what had happened. And his conclusions were two-fold: one moment he thought that it was all fancy, at another that he had heard a voice, truly. Well, he argued, such things have happened before.

Thus sat Martin at his window, working less than looking out of it, and no sooner would a pair of boots of foreign make pass by then, straining his body, he would try to catch a glimpse through the window, not of the legs alone but of the face too. There goes the dvornik (porter) in new felt boots [5], there comes the water-carrier, and finally an old invalid soldier of the Nicholas period, in worn-out and mended felt boots and leggings, armed with a snow-shovel, stood before the window. Avdeyitch recognised him by those leggings. Stepanitch was the old man’s name, and he lived with a neighbouring merchant, on charity. His duty was to help the porter. Stepanitch commenced to shovel away the snow from before the window; Avdeyitch looked at him and then returned to his work.

“I must have lost my senses in my old age!” laughed Avdeyitch to himself. “Stepanitch is cleaning away the snow and I am here fancying Christ is coming to visit me. I must be a doting old fool, that’s what I am.” Nevertheless, having drawn his needle through about a dozen times, Avdeyitch was again attracted to look through the window. And, having looked, he saw Stepanitch who, placing his spade against a wall, was trying to warm himself or perhaps get a rest.

“The man is old, broken down, perchance too weak even to clean off the snow”, said to himself Avdeyitch, “warm tea might be welcome to him, and, as luck has it, there’s the samovar ready to boil over.” So he stuck in his awl, rose, placed the samovar on the table, poured boiling water over the tea, and tapped with his finger on the window-pane. Stepanitch turned round and approached the window; Avdeyitch beckoned to him and went to open the door.

“Walk in and warm thyself”, he said. “Feel cold, hey?”

“Christ save us, I do, and all my bones aching!” In walked Stepanitch, shook off some snow, and, so as not to soil the floor, made a feeble attempt to wipe his feet, himself nearly falling.

“Don’t trouble to wipe; I’ll scrub it off myself; that’s our business. Come and sit down”, said Avdeyitch. “There, have some tea.” Filling two glasses, he placed one before his guest, and pouring tea out of his own glass into his saucer, proceeded to blow on it.

Stepanitch emptied his glass, turned it upside down on its saucer, and placing on it the bit of sugar he had not used [6], he rendered thanks for the tea. But he evidently longed for another glass.

“Have some more”, said Avdeyitch, filling the two glasses again, for himself and guest. Thus he talked and drank, yet never losing sight of the window.

“Art thou expecting anyone?”enquired the guest.

“Do I expect anyone? Seems queer to say - whom I keep expecting. Not that I really expect anyone, only a certain word stuck in my heart. A vision, or whatever it was, I cannot say. Hearken thou to me, brother mine. Last night I was reading the Gospel about Father Christ, all about how he suffered and how he walked on earth. Thou hast heard of it, hast thou not?”

“Aye, heard of it, we have heard”, answered Stepanitch. “But we are dark people [7] and have not been taught to read.”

“Well, then, I was reading just about this very same thing, how he walked the earth, and I read, you know, how he visited the Pharisee and the Pharisee failed to give him a reception. And I was reading this last night, thou brother mine, and, while reading, fell a-thinking. How is it that he could receive Christ, our Father, without any honours. Had this happened as an example to myself or anyone else, methinks nothing would have been too good with which to receive him. And that other one, offering no reception! Well, that’s what I kept thinking about, until I fell a-napping like. And while napping, brother mine, I heard my name called, lifted my head and heard a voice, just as if someone whispered, ‘Expect me, I’ll come to-morrow’, and that twice. Well, believe me or not, but that voice remained fixed in my head from that moment - and here I am, chiding myself for it, and still expecting Him, our Father.”

Stepanitch shook his head wonderingly and said nothing, but emptying his glass, placed it this time on its side [8], but Avdeyitch lifted it up again and poured out more tea.

“Drink more and may it give thee health. So then I think to myself, when He, the Father, walked the earth, He scorned no man, but associated more with the common people, visiting rather the simple folk and selecting his disciples out of the ranks of the poorer brethren, the same as we sinners are ourselves, journeymen and the like. ‘Whosoever shall exalt himself’, says He, ‘shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted. You call Me Lord’, says He, ‘and I’, He says, ‘will wash your feet for you. If any man desire to be first, the same shall be servant of all. Because’, says He, ‘blessed are the poor, the meek and the merciful’.”

Being an old, and soft hearted fellow, Stepanitch forgot his tea. And there he sat listening, big tears running down his cheeks.

“Come, have some more tea”, said Avdeyitch. But Stepanitch, crossing himself [9], rendered thanks, pushed away his glass and arose to depart.

“Thanks to thee, Martin Avdeyitch”, he said; “thou hast entertained me well and fed, both soul and body.”

“Pray thee come again; a guest is ever welcome”, replied Avdeyitch. Stepanitch departed, and Martin pouring out the last drop of tea, cleared away the tea things and sat down once more to his table under the window, to backstitch a seam. There he sat backstitching, but still looking out through the window, awaiting the Christ, thinking of Him and His doings, his head full of Christ’s various discourses.

Two soldiers passed by, one in regimental, the other in his own boots; passed the proprietor of a neighbouring house, in brightly polished overshoes, and finally the baker with his basket. All passed and vanished, and now a woman in woollen stockings and village shoes walks past the window and stops at the partition wall. Looks up at her from under the window panes Avdeyitch,  and sees an unknown female poorly clad, with a baby in her arms, placing herself with her back against the wind and trying to wrap up the baby but having nothing to wrap it in. Her garments are thin and worn. And Avdeyitch through his window, hears the child crying, and she trying, but unable, to hush him. Arose Avdeyitch, opened the door, passed up the staircase and called:

“Goody;  hey, my goody!”

The woman heard him and turned round.

“Wherefore standest thou with that little child in the cold? Come into the warm room, where thon canst wrap him at thine ease. Here, come down here!” The woman looked surprised. She sees an old man in his working apron, and with spectacles on his nose inviting her into his shop. She followed him. Reaching the bottom of the landing, they entered the room, and the old man led the woman to his bed. “Sit down here, my goody, nearer to the oven - just to warm thyself and feed the baby.”

“No milk left; had nothing myself to eat since morning;” sadly muttered the woman, preparing nevertheless to feed the babe.

Shook his old head Avdeyitch, upon hearing this, went to the table, got some bread and a bowl, opened the oven-door, poured into the cup some stshy, got out from the oven a pot with kasha, but found it had not steamed up to the proper point yet, returned with the stshy alone, and placed it on the table with the bread; and taking a wiping-cloth from a hook, he laid it near the rest.

“Sit down”, says he, “and eat, my goody, and I’ll take meanwhile care of thy infant. I had babes myself - so I know how to deal with ’em.”

The woman crossing herself, went to the table and commenced eating, and Avdeyitch took her place on the bedstead near the baby, and began smacking his lips at it, but smack as he would he smacked them badly, for he had no teeth. The little child kept on crying. Then it occurred to Avdeyitch to startle it with his finger; to raise high his hand with finger uplifted, and bringing it rapidly down, right near the baby’s mouth, and as hastily withdrawing it. The finger was all black, stained with cobbler’s wax, so he would not allow the baby to take it into its mouth. The little one at last got interested in the black finger, and while looking at it, ceased crying and soon began to smile and coo. Avdeyitch felt overjoyed. And the woman went on eating, at the same time narrating who she was and whence she came.

She was a soldier’s wife, she said, whose husband had been marched off somewhere eight months before and since then had never been heard from. She was living as a cook when her baby was born, but since then, they would not keep her with it.

“And now it’s the third month that I am out of a situation”, she went on. “All I possessed is pawned for food. I offered myself as wet-nurse, but didn’t suit - was too lean, they said. Tried with the merchant’s wife, yonder, where a countrywoman is in service, and she promised to have me. I had understood it was from to-day, and so went, but was told to come next week. She lives far. I got tired out and wore him out too, the poor little soul. Thanks to our landlady, she pities the poor and keeps us for the sake of Christ under her roof. Otherwise I know not how I would have pulled through.”

Heaving a sigh, Avdeyitch asked: “And hast thou no warmer clothing?”

“Just the time, my own one, to keep warm clothing! But yesterday I pawned my last shawl for twenty copecks.”

Approaching the bed the woman took her child, and Avdeyitch, repairing to a corner in the wall, rummaged among some clothing and brought forth an old sleeveless coat.

“There”, he said, “though it be a worn-out garment, still it may serve thee to wrap him up with.”

The woman looked at the coat, looked at the old man and began weeping. Avdeyitch turned away too, crawled under the bed and dragging out a trunk rummaged in it and sat down again, opposite the woman.

And the woman said: “Christ save  thee, old father, it is He perchance, who sent me under thy window. I would have had my child frozen. When I left the house it was warm, and now, behold the frost is beginning. It’s He, the Father, who made thee look out of the window and take pity on hapless me.”

Smiled Avdeyitch, and said:

“Aye, it’s He who made me. It’s not to lose time, my goody,  that I keep on the look-out.”

And then Martin told the soldier’s wife also his dream, how he had heard a voice promising him that the Lord would visit him that day.

“All things are possible”, remarked the woman, and arising put on the coat, wrapped up in its folds her little one and bowing, commenced again to thank Avdeyitch.

“Accept this for the sake of Christ”, answered Avdeyitch, giving her a twenty copeck piece, to get back her shawl from the pawnshop. Once more the woman crossed her brow, and Avdeyitch crossed his, and went out to see her off.

The woman was gone. Avdeyitch ate some broth, cleaned the table, and sat down to his work again. His hands are busy, but he keeps the window in mind and no sooner a shadow falls on it than he looks up to see who goes by. Some acquaintances passed along, and some strangers likewise, but he saw nothing and no one out of the ordinary.

But suddenly, Avdeyitch sees stopping opposite his window an old woman, a fruit-seller. She is carrying a wicker basket with apples. Few remain, she must have sold them all, for, hanging across her back is a bag full of chips, got by her no doubt, at some building in construction, and which she now carries home. But the heavy bag hurts her, it seems; trying to shift it from one shoulder to the other, she drops it down on the kerb, places her wicker basket on a street post, and proceeds to pack the chips tighter in the bag.

As she is shaking the bag, there suddenly appears from behind the street corner a small boy, in a ragged cap, who  seizes an apple and is in the act of disappearing unperceived, when the old woman abruptly turning round, grasps him with both hands by the coat sleeve. The boy struggles, trying to get away, but the old woman seizing him in her arms knocks off his cap and catches him by the hair. The boy cries at the top of his voice, the old woman swears. Losing no time to put away his awl, Avdeyitch throws it on the floor, makes for the door, runs up the steps, stumbles and loses his spectacles, and reaches the street. On runs Avdeyitch, on goes the old woman, shaking the small boy by his hair, cursing and threatening to drag him to the policeman; the small boy kicking and denying: “I did not take thine apple; why shouldst thou beat me, let go!” Then Avdeyitch endeavoured to separate them, and taking the boy by the hand, said:

“Let him go, babooshka (grandmother), forgive him for the sake of Christ.”

“I’ll forgive him so that he won’t forget it till the next switches! I’ll take the rascal to the police.” And Avdeyitch began to entreat the old woman.

“Let him go, babooshka”, he said. “He won’t do it again. Let go, for Christ’s sake!”

The old woman let the boy go, who prepared to run away, but now Avdeyitch would not let him.

“Beg granny’s pardon”, he said, “and don’t do it again. I saw thee take the apple.” The boy burst into tears and begged the old woman to forgive him.

“Now, that’s right. And there, have the apple now.” And Avdeyitch, taking an apple out of the basket, gave it to the small boy. “I’ll pay thee for it, grandmother”, said he to the old woman.

“Thou wilt spoil the dirty urchins”, said the woman. “His best reward should be of such a nature that he could not lie on his back for a week.”

“Nay, nay, mother”, said Avdeyitch, “not so. This may be according to our law, but it is not according to the law of God. If he deserves flogging for a stolen apple, then what should be the punishment for our sins?”

The old woman was silent.

And Avdeyitch told the old woman the parable about the Lord who loosed his servant and forgave him his debt, the servant going forthwith and laying his hands on his debtor, throttling him and casting him into prison. The old woman stood and listened, and the boy stood and listened. “God commands that we should forgive our brothers their trespasses”, said Avdeyitch, “that the same should be done unto us. Forgive all, let alone an unreasoning child.”

The old woman shook her head and sighed.

“That’s so, that’s so”, she said, “but children have become too unruly now-a-days.”

“Just why we old people should teach them better!” said Avdeyitch.

“I say so, too”,  replied the old woman. “I had seven of them, myself, but only one daughter is left to me out of them all.”And the old woman began telling where and how she lived with her daughter, and the number of grandchildren she had.  “See”, she went on, “my strength is almost gone, and still I work, pitying the chicks,  for my grandchildren are very good and none love me better than they. As to Aksyutka, she won’t leave my arms for anyone. ‘Granny, dear granny, my heart’ …. says she.” And the old woman softened entirely. “Of course, that’s a child’s doings. God be with him”,  she added, looking at the boy.

As she prepares to hoist the bag of chips on her back, the little boy, making up, says: “Let me carry it, granny, for you; I am going your way.” Shook her head reflectively the old one, nodded and placed the load on the boy’s back.

And both went along the street, the old woman actually forgetting to ask Avdeyitch for the price of her apple. Avdeyitch stood looking at them and kept listening to their dying voices, as they went on holding converse together.

Having seen them off, Avdeyitch returned to his room, found his spectacles on the steps unbroken, picked up his awl and sat at his work once more. After working for a little time he could no longer thread the bristles through the holes, and saw the lamp-lighter passing on his way to light the street lanterns.

“Time to light my lamp”, he thought; so he trimmed it, hooked it on to the wall and continued his work. One boot was now ready; he turned it on all sides and examined it; it was all right. He gathered his tools, brushed off the parings, put away the bristles, stray bits and strings, took down his lamp, placed it on the table and got from the shelf his Gospels. He tried to open the book on the page which he had marked the night before with a bit of morocco leather, but it opened at another place. And no sooner had Avdeyitch opened it than he remembered his last night’s dream. And no sooner did it come back to him than it seemed to him as if someone moved about behind him, softly shuffling his feet. Turns round our Avdeyitch, and sees something like people standing in the dark corner - men of whom he is yet unable to say who they are. And the voice whispers into his ear:

“Martin! Hey, Martin. Knowest thou me not?”

“Know whom?” cried Avdeyitch.

“Me”, said the voice, “it is I.” And out from the dark corner emerged Stepanitch, smiled, vanished cloud-like, and was no more.

“And that is I”, said the same voice, the woman with the little child coming out of the dark corner; and the woman smiled and the little child cooed, and they too were gone. “And that is I”, said the voice, followed by the old woman and the little boy with the apple, and both smiled and forthwith vanished too.

And great joy crept into Martin’s heart, and making the sign of the cross he put on his spectacles and began reading there where the Book had opened. And on the top of the page he read:

“For I was hungered and ye gave me meat, I was thirsty and ye gave me drink, I was a stranger and ye took me in.” And further down the page he read:

“Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these, My  brethren, ye have done it unto Me.” (Matth. xxv.)

And Avdeyitch knew that his dream had not deceived him, but that on that day the Saviour had indeed come to visit him, and that he had indeed received Him.

NOTES BY H.P.B.:

[1] In the Slavonian text the word is “shirt”, not “coat”, as in the English texts.

[2]Cabbage broth.

[3] Thick porridge of buck-wheat.

[4] Brass tea-urn to boil water in.

[5] Valenki, thick felt boots without soles.

[6]Though they drink tea immoderately, the lower classes of Russia do not sugar it, but bite a piece off from a lump which serves them for several glasses, the guest leaving his remaining piece in the manner described.

[7] The Russian peasant, and the lower classes call themselves “dark” or ignorant people. They also often use the plural pronoun “we” instead of the pronoun “I” when speaking of themselves.

[8] An act of politeness, denoting that he had enough tea.

[9] Making the sign of the cross, which people in Russia do before and after every meal.

00000000

Read Tolstoy’s tale “The Story of Alcoholic Drinks”. Also translated by H. P. Blavatsky,  it can be found through the List of  Texts in Alphabetical Order at www.TheosophyOnline.comwww.Esoteric-Philosophy.comand www.FilosofiaEsoterica.com.

00000000000000000

On Facebook, see the pages The Aquarian Theosophist  and  E-Theosophy.
  


If you want to have access to a daily study of the original teachings of Theosophy, write to   lutbr@terra.com.br  and ask for information on the e-group  E-Theosophy.


On the difference between truth and falsehood in the modern esoteric movement, see the book “The Fire and Light of Theosophical Literature”, by Carlos Cardoso Aveline.  

Published in 2013 by The Aquarian Theosophist, the volume has 255 pages and can be obtained through  Amazon Books.


00000000000000000000000000000000000000

THE ADEPTS IN AMERICA IN 1776

$
0
0
Masters of the Wisdom Work For a
New Order of Ages in Human History

William Judge




000000000000000000000000000000000

A 2013 Editorial Note

The following article was first
published in “The Theosophist”,  Adyar, in
October 1883, and signed “by an Ex-Asiatic”.
It shows an interesting aspect of the work for
mankind developed by Western and Eastern Sages.
It also destroys the pseudo-theosophical delusion
according to which theosophy has nothing to do
with ethics in Politics, or with justice in social and
economical structures. In fact, theosophy is wisdom
and altruism applied to each and every department of life.

(Carlos Cardoso Aveline)

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000


The following suggestions and statements are made entirely upon the personal responsibility of the writer, and without the knowledge or consent - as far as he knows - of the adepts who are in general terms therein referred to.

The reflecting mind is filled with astonishment upon reviewing the history of the rise of the United States of N. America, when it perceives that dogmatic theology has no foundation in any part of the Declaration of Independence or Constitution for the structure which it fain would raise and has so often since tried to erect within and upon the government. We are astonished because those documents were formulated and that government established at a time when dogmatism of one kind or another had supreme sway. Although the Puritans and others had come to America for religious freedom, they were still very dogmatic and tenacious of their own peculiar theories and creed; so that if we found in this fundamental law much about religion and religious establishments, we would not be surprised. But in vain do we look for it, in vain did the supporters of the iron church attempt to lay the needed corner stone, and today America rejoices at it, and has thereby found it possible to grow with the marvellous growth that has been the wonder of Europe.

The nullification of these efforts made by bigotry in 1776 was due to the adepts who now look over and give the countenance of their great name to the Theosophical Society.

They oversaw the drafting of the Declaration and the drawing of the Constitution, and that is why no foothold is to be found for these blatant Christians who desire to inject God into the constitution.

In the declaration, from which freedom sprang, “nature and nature’s god” are referred to. In the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs the natural rights of man are specified, such as life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The king is spoken of as being unworthy to be “the head of a civilized nation”, nothing being said as to whether he was the head, or worthy to be, of a Christian one.

In appealing to their British brethren, the declaration says the appeal is “made to their native justice and magnanimity”. All reference to religion and Christianity or God’s commands are left out. This was for the very good reason that for 1700 years religion had battled against progress, against justice, against magnanimity, against the rights of man. And in the concluding sentence the signers mutually pledge each other to its support ignoring all appeals to God.

In the constitution of 1787 the preamble declares that the instrument was made for union, for justice, for tranquillity and defence, the general good and liberty. Art. VI says no religious test as a qualification for office shall ever be required, and the 1st Amendment prohibits an establishment of religion or restraint of its free exercise.

The great Theosophical Adepts in looking around the world for a mind through which they could produce in America the reaction which was then needed, found in England, Thomas Paine. In 1774 they influenced him, through the help of that worthy Brother Benjamin Franklin, to come to America. He came here and was the main instigator of the separation of the Colonies from the British Crown. At the suggestion of Washington, Franklin, Jefferson and other Freemasons, whose minds through the teachings of the symbolic degrees of masonry were fitted to reason correctly, and to reject theological conservation, he wrote “Common Sense”, which was the torch to the pile whose blaze burned away the bonds between England and America. For “Common Sense” he was often publicly thanked. George Washington wrote September 10th, 1783, to Paine:

“I shall be exceedingly happy to see you. Your presence may remind Congress of your past services to this country, and if it is in my power to impress them, command my best exertions with freedom, as they will be rendered cheerfully by one who entertains a lively sense of the importance of your works.”

And again in June 1784, in a letter to Madison, Washington says:

“Can nothing be done in our assembly for poor Paine? Must the merits and services of ‘Common Sense’ continue to glide down the stream of time unrewarded by this country? His writings certainly have had a powerful effect upon the public mind. Ought they not then to meet an adequate return?” [1]

In the “Age of Reason” which he wrote in Paris several years after, Paine says:

“I saw, or at least I thought I saw, a vast scene opening itself to the worldin the affairs of America; and it appeared to me that unless the Americans changed the plan they were then pursuing and declared themselves independent, they would not only involve themselves in a multiplicity of new difficulties, but shut out the prospect that was then offering itself to mankind through their means.” Further on he says: “There are two distinct classes of thoughts; those produced by reflection, and those that bolt into the mind of their own accord. I have always made it a rule to treat these voluntary visitors with civility, and it is from them I have acquired all the knowledge that I have.

These “voluntary visitors” were injected into his brain by the Adepts, Theosophists. Seeing that a new order of ages was about to commence and that there was a new chance for freedom and the brotherhood of man, they laid before the eye of Thomas Paine - who they knew could be trusted to stand almost alone with the lamp of truth in his hand amidst others who in “times that tried men’s souls” quaked with fear, - a “vast scene opening itself to Mankind in the affairs of America.” The result was the Declaration, the Constitution for America. And as if to give point to these words and to his declaration that he saw this vast scene opening itself, this new order of ages, the design of the reverse side of the U.S. great seal is a pyramid whose capstone is removed with the blazing eye in a triangle over it dazzling the sight, above it are the words “the heavens approve”, while underneath appears the startling sentence “a new order of ages.”

That he had in his mind’s eye a new order of ages we cannot doubt upon reading in his “Rights of Man”, Part 2, Chap. 2, “no beginning could be made in Asia, Africa or Europe, to reform the political condition of man. She (America) made a stand not for herself alone, but for the world, and looked beyond the advantage she could receive.” In Chap. 4, “The case and circumstances of America present themselves as in the beginning of a world ... there is a morning of reason rising upon man, on the subject of Government, that has not appeared before.”

The design “of the seal” was not an accident, but was actually intended to symbolize the building and firm founding of a new order of ages. It was putting into form the idea which by means of a “voluntary visitor” was presented to the mind of Thomas Paine, of a vast scene opening itself, the beginning in America of “a new order of ages”. That side of the seal has never been cut or used, and at this day the side in use has not the sanction of law. In the spring of 1841, when Daniel Webster was Secretary of State, a new seal was cut, and instead of the eagle holding in his sinister claw 13 arrows as intended, he holds only six. Not only was this change unauthorized, but the cause for it is unknown. [2] When the other side is cut and used, will not the new order of ages have actually been established?

More then is claimed for the Theosophical Adepts than the changing of baser metal into gold, or the possession of such a merely material thing as the elixir of life. They watch the progress of man and help him on in his halting flight up the steep plane of progress. They hovered over Washington, Jefferson, and all the other brave freemasons who dared to found a free Government in the West, which could be pure from the dross of dogmatism, they cleared their minds, inspired their pens and left upon the great seal of this mighty nation the memorial of their presence.

(“The Theosophist”, October, 1883.)


NOTES BY W.Q. JUDGE:

[1] 9 Sparks, 49.

[2] See U.S. State Dept. archives.

00000000000000


On the difference betweentruth and falsehood in the esoteric movement, see the book “The Fire and Light of Theosophical Literature”, by Carlos Cardoso Aveline.  Published in 2013 by The Aquarian Theosophist, the volume has 255 pages and can be obtained through Amazon Books.
  
On Facebook, see the pages The Aquarian Theosophist  and  E-Theosophy.

  

If you want to have access to a daily study of the original teachings of Theosophy, write to  lutbr@terra.com.br  and ask for information on the e-group  E-Theosophy.


00000000000000000000000000000000000000

A SILENT AND INVISIBLE WORK

$
0
0
To Bring the Truths of Theosophy
Before the Greatest Number of Persons

Steven H. Levy, M. D.

0000000000000000000000000000000000000

The following article was first published in
“The Aquarian Theosophist”, November 2012 edition.

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000




The Inner Tree of Life Transcends Every Noise



“The sparks that fly forth from the
mouths and pens of a few visible and noticed
workers have their origin in the inner living fire
kept ablaze by the many who go unnoticed.”


The center of the whole Theosophical Movement is not of the earth so it can never be destroyed by the outer affairs of humanity. Nor does its influence ever cease. The formation of a nucleus of universal brotherhood is its body on the physical plane, but its soul and spirit dwells in the heart and mind of Man and Nature. Karma determines and checks its outer manifestation and the degree of its psychic and spiritual influence. 

As the real work of psychic, mental and spiritual development of a human being is invisible and within, the truest work for the Cause of the Theosophical Movement is hidden from view and not exposed to any praise or blame, except that imposed by the inner Man. Altruistic works are initiated, maintained and perpetuated by right motive, right faith, and right devotion. The work of dissemination of the truths of Theosophy springs from keeping the center strong by charity and compassion, faith in the Masters and Their accumulated wisdom, and devotion to the highest welfare of Humanity. 

Regardless of the degree of intellectual capacity, physical skills of communication and action, or favorable environmental and personal circumstances of the individual, every Theosophist is gifted with the heart qualities of love, faith and devotion to do real and valuable work for the cause. In fact the majority of workers for the cause and the greatest forces for good in the work are silent and unperceived. Their work and influence is felt. The sparks that fly forth from the mouths and pens of a few visible and noticed workers have their origin in the inner living fire kept ablaze by the many who go unnoticed.

Although the karma of this cycle may check all that we would like to achieve on the outer plane, there is no limit to the enthusiasm and inner work that can be done. All that is needed is patience and trust in the law of karma, the Teachings, the Masters, and the definite lines of work They laid down.

The Temple of Wisdom and Truth was, is and will always be built “without the noise of a tool being heard.”  As William Q. Judge writes:

“Do not think you do nothing for the Cause which is so dear to you, for indeed the truest work is done on the inner planes, and without this there could be no work done on the outer planes. So, remember that you can work and are doing real work to help the cause by being strong in heart, in trust, and in devotion. In this way, you help to keep the centre of the whole movement strong, and others, who can work on the outer plane, will be helped to do their work because the centre is strong, and they themselves get help from it. This is what you can do and you should think of it often.....”

“If we keep in mind that what we ought to work for is to bring the truths of Theosophy before the greatest number of persons and not that we seek office or honour, then our best efforts must have good results...”

“At present your test and your trial are in the great enthusiasm you have with but little vent. By standing this, it will do you good; but, using all opportunity for others in your present circumstances, you will take all that nature offers and she will, later on, offer you more and better chances if you are fit-not otherwise....”

And also:

“In regard to the movement, you may be sure that it will be taken care of if the members do their part. H. P. [Blavatsky]  laid down the lines of work and if we follow these we may safely leave the results in the hands of the Master and the Law of Karma.” [1]

NOTE: 

[1]“Letters That Have Helped Me”, William Q. Judge, The Theosophy Company, Los Angeles, California, 1946, see pp. 171-172.

000000000000

Steven H. Levy, M. D., is a long-standing associate of the United Lodge of Theosophists, ULT.  He lives in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.


00000000000000000000


On the difference between truth and falsehood in the esoteric movement, see the book “The Fire and Light of Theosophical Literature”, by Carlos Cardoso Aveline.  Published in 2013 by The Aquarian Theosophist, the volume has 255 pages and can be obtained through  Amazon Books.
  
On Facebook, see the pages The Aquarian Theosophist  and  E-Theosophy.

  

If you want to have access to a daily study of the original teachings of Theosophy, write to  lutbr@terra.com.br  and ask for information on the e-group  E-Theosophy.

00000000000000000000000000000000000000

THE FUTURE PRESIDENT OF THE ADYAR SOCIETY

$
0
0
The Real Choices To Be Made
In 2014 Are Not About Personalities

Carlos Cardoso Aveline




Who’s going to be the next international president and leader of the Theosophical Society (Adyar), starting in 2014?  

The Adyar TS gathers together some 80 percent or more of the nominal theosophists worldwide.

It makes or breaks for the movement as a whole.  It is co-responsible for the future of mankind. It needs to accelerate a rebirth of Ethics which it is now undergoing already. However, for those who can only think of personalities and outward aspects of life there is no interest whatsoever in any of the challenges facing the theosophical movement in the present century. Ill-informed and naïve people think Ethics and Duty are mere words. Children-souls feel the right thing to do is to gossip and speculate about personal names, as if this sort of misinformation had any substance except wind.  

They can’t pay attention, for instance, to the subtle yet clear language used by Dr. N. C. Ramanujachary in his interview to “The Aquarian Theosophist”, November 2013 edition:  “Living Up to the Original Programme”. [1]

Childish souls apart, the matter of the fact is that the Adyar Society has been for decades slowly getting rid of the 1900-1934 illusions and false versions of theosophy. They have been mainly dysfunctional since the 1980s.   

The process of recovering Ethics and of cherishing once more the original teachings is now firmly taking place and accelerating due to the dynamics of karma, with limited help from any visible leaders. It can be, and should be, accelerated in a conscious way by the next international president in Adyar. 

The awakening has to be gradual: it does not need to be too slow. Personal pride plays no role in real theosophy or in helping mankind. Strong steps could be taken, and a price will have to be paid anyway, before opening the path towards a healthy future.  A person, a lodge or national section can make the whole difference. [2]

Tests and opportunities come together, an unavoidable truism which happens to be valid for the Adyar Society, for the United Lodge of Theosophists, the Theosophical Society (Pasadena) and every other sincerely theosophical association around the world.   

NOTES:


[2] See the article “The Center of the Pascal’s Sphere”, by Carlos Cardoso Aveline. It can be found through the List of Texts in Alphabetical Order at  www.TheosophyOnline.com and www.Esoteric-Philosophy.com, or at the Lista de Textos por Ordem Alfabética, in  www.FilosofiaEsoterica.com .

00000000

The above article was published on 11 December 2013.

00000000000000

On the difference between truth and falsehood in the esoteric movement, see the book “The Fire and Light of Theosophical Literature”, by Carlos Cardoso Aveline.


  
 
Published in 2013 by The Aquarian Theosophist, the volume has 255 pages and can be obtained through  Amazon Books.
  
On Facebook, see the pages The Aquarian Theosophist , BlavatskyArchivesOnline, Esoteric Philosophy and  E-Theosophy.

  

If you want to have access to a daily study of the original teachings of Theosophy, write to  lutbr@terra.com.br  and ask for information on the e-group  E-Theosophy.

00000000000000000000000000000000000000

N. C. RAMANUJACHARY: LIVING UP TO THE ORIGINAL PROGRAM

$
0
0
A Dialogue On the Perspectives of the
Adyar Society After Radha Burnier’s Presidency


Carlos Cardoso Aveline


 Ms. Radha Burnier (1923-2013)



000000000000000000000000000000000000000

In the following interview, given to “The
Aquarian Theosophist” and its associated
websites, Dr. N. C. Ramanujachary makes
a frank assessment of the recent decades in
the life of the Theosophical Society (Adyar).
He formulates a few fundamental propositions
for its future efforts: among them, to promote the
Original Program of the theosophical movement.

Dr. N. C. Ramanujachary is currently the
Joint-General Secretary and Director of Studies
for the Indian Section of the Theosophical
Society (Adyar).  Born at Vijayawadain the
Krishna district of Andhrapradesy on 14th
February 1935, he has been a member of the Adyar
Society since 1958. Several of his articles can be
found at www.TheosophyOnline.com  and associated
websites. He lives in the BesantGardens, at the
International Headquarters in Adyar, Chennai, India.

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000



THE AQUARIAN:

Mrs. Radha Burnier, the president of the Adyar Theosophical Society since 1980, has passed away on October 31, 2013.  She led a life of altruism. She was a strong and inspiring leader. One could make a Pythagorean review of the TS efforts under her leadership.

N. C. RAMANUJACHARY:

Mrs. Burnier held the office of International President of the Theosophical Society for 33 years (1980-2013), which is far beyond that occupied by any of her predecessors.

She brings with her a sort of inherent culture.  She belonged to a family associated with the work of the Society almost from the time of its arrival at Adyar (Madras/Chennai) in 1882. She was born on the campus of the Society and lived therein (except for few years) all her life. She studied the languages and philosophies of the times, held offices such as General Secretary of Indian Section (the largest in numerical strength), was the Director of the Adyar Library and Research Centre, one of the remarkable centers in the world.  Mrs. Burnier was also the President of Theosophical Order of Service, Besant Educational Fellowship, New Life for India Movement, Environmental Society,  etc. She was deeply interested in the spiritual regeneration of humanity, among other lively themes. She was also involved with the work and philosophy of J. Krishnamurti, and helped in reestablishing his Centre in Madrasin its troubled times.

THE AQUARIAN:

What’s your general view of the historical period between 1980 and 2013?

N. C. RAMANUJACHARY:

Any period in history is “contemporary” and the same time “transitory”. This was comparatively a “peaceful” and “comfortable” period for sincere and genuine work, particularly in the sphere of popularizing the theosophical ideals, principles and tenets.

Ground work was well prepared and seeded by the earlier generation members and leaders. There was verbal and vocal acceptance for all good things and concepts, but the behavioral patterns of people were diametrically opposite. A sort of “artificial” and “pseudo” structure came to be established in all walks of life. Undeclared confusion in the human consciousness became the “order of the day”. Wrong and unethical values of life have come to be obtaining “acceptance”. All this needed a continued and consistent “good and advanced work” from organizations such as the Theosophical Society.

THE AQUARIAN:

What were some of the major accomplishments in these decades?

N. C. RAMANUJACHARY:

Survival and Sustenance of Human Values, in spite of the confused state of human predicament, appears to be the hallmark of the period. “Satyameva Jayete, naa anritam” (Truth alone survives victorious, not the unrighteous) is the hope of the Few who are determined and rooted in Intelligence (Dharma Nishta and Sthita Prajna). A lot of Unfinished Agenda is before them and needs to be pursued effectively and logically.

THE AQUARIAN:

What good things could have been done, but were not possible, and why? 

N. C. RAMANUJACHARY:

Goodness is the fundamental and ultimate virtue; it can be forked in numerous rays. Once it is definite that “To Live to Benefit Humanity” is the highest ideal worth living for, men and women of the world choose their unique and particular way.

In order “to popularize the doctrines of theosophy”, there is unavoidable need to present the doctrines in the popular and presentable language of the ever-changing times.
Rewriting and retelling the concepts; ruling out the thin line of demarcation between the ancient and the modern thought is necessary.

The Adyar Library was established in 1886 to encourage the study of Comparative Religion, Philosophy and Science among educated classes. There is a need to tune them to the study of theosophical tenets, establishing peace and harmony in the Human Heart, and making them the “living truths” of the day is apparent. Reinterpreting the truths in the present day context, not just reiterating them, and bringing up new series of texts in the world-languages could be accelerated.

We need literature to improve the “quality of life” and to pave the way for the bright and well illuminated future of humanity at large. The intrinsic and implied meanings of the three declared objects [1] and the few “undeclared” objects are to be focused sufficiently well to show them as the basic need for human advancement in its total panorama.   Added to the Man-power, the need  is “Will-power”.

THE AQUARIAN:

Looking at the accumulated experience since 1980, what are some of the main lessons regarding the future of the Adyar Theosophical Society?

N. C. RAMANUJACHARY:

To live up to the “Original Program” and to ventilate the fundamentals of the “esoteric” philosophy that have rightly become the “exoteric”. 

To improve the circulation of theosophical literature, periodicals and magazines committed to the doctrines and their dissemination. 

Making “real” the three objects: helping the Human nature dovetail into the Divine.

THE AQUARIAN:

Considering that just like seeds planted, small actions may have great consequences in due time, what should be done now, in order to pave the way to a correct future of the theosophical movement and with regard to the certainly bright future of mankind as a whole?

N. C. RAMANUJACHARY:

Bringing together all the Right-minded and the like-minded population into a common stream and showing that “there is no other way” (Na-anyah-pantha) to the welfare and prosperity of the planet.

Total elimination of the personality and every notion connected with “I and Mine”; and a deep resolve to adhere to the Collective Good.

THE AQUARIAN:

What are the main duties of the theosophical movement towards “the great orphan”, humanity, in the first half of the present century?

N. C. RAMANUJACHARY:

To tell them convincingly that they are the “orphan” and there is a way to “redeem” and “restore” them. To tell them that they have a Spiritual Right on the globe/universe; there is absolute need to dispel the ‘intellectual pride’ (not allowing that to become the spiritual pride).

To make it abundantly clear that the “future” depends on what we do now; and to see the “duration” as continuous and time as mere “continual”. Consciousness is a deep ocean, eternal and infinite.

THE AQUARIAN:

What can each sincere theosophist around the world do in order to help the theosophical movement fulfill its duties?

N. C. RAMANUJACHARY:

To be deeply soaked in the “fundamental” and ineffable doctrines as envisaged and as would be found out, rediscovered; help others see the truth of the matter and “honestly” live up to what they believe. To allow no dichotomy between Precept and Practice, Belief and Behavior, Promise and Performance -; this must be the minimum program.

THE AQUARIAN:

What kind of leaders does the theosophical movement need now, in the Theosophical Society (Adyar) as in other associations, and globally as well as locally?

N. C. RAMANUJACHARY:

A leader must always be the one who stands out Unique and Important, though not proclaiming himself as such, and readily prepared to understand the universal mind.


NOTE:

[1] The three declared Objects of the Theosophical Movement are:  1) To form a nucleus of the universal brotherhood of humanity, without distinction of race, creed, sex, caste or color; 2) To encourage the comparative study of religion, philosophy and science (especially Eastern) ;  3) To investigate unexplained laws of nature and the powers latent in humanity.  (CCA)

00000000

The above article was published on 7 November 2013.

00000000000000


On the difference between truth and falsehood in the esoteric movement, see the book “The Fire and Light of Theosophical Literature”, by Carlos Cardoso Aveline.  Published in 2013 by The Aquarian Theosophist, the volume has 255 pages and can be obtained through  Amazon Books.
  
On Facebook, see the pages The Aquarian Theosophist  and  E-Theosophy.
  


If you want to have access to a daily study of the original teachings of Theosophy, write to  lutbr@terra.com.br  and ask for information on the e-group  E-Theosophy.


00000000000000000000000000000000000000

WHY ONE SHOULD DISDAIN HARDSHIPS

$
0
0
A Lecture by Musonius, the Stoic of Ancient Rome

Musonius Rufus




Editorial Commentary:

There are four great Stoic philosophers of ancient Rome, whose lessons are especially significant in the 21st century. Three of them are well-known and their writings can be found in good bookshops around the world: Lucius Seneca, Marcus Aurelius, and Epictetus. The fourth one, however - Musonius Rufus (28? - 100 or 102, C.E.) - is still little known. Yet he is as great as any Stoic could be.

Helena P. Blavatsky quotes Epictetus several times in her writings; and Epictetus is one of the best known disciples of Musonius.  He adopted the same pedagogical method and followed the steps of Musonius in concentrating his attention on ethics, or “right living”. 

Musonius’ teachings certainly belong in any theosophical library. The following transcription is taken from a work that is available online. [1] Another version of the same transcription is included in a little-known book. [2] Original title of the online version: “That One Should Disdain Hardships”.

(Carlos Cardoso Aveline)


NOTES:      
                                                                                            

[2] “Musonius Rufus”, translated by Cynthia King,  with a preface by William B. Ervine , CreateSpace,  Lexington,  KY, USA, 2011, copyright 2010, 101 pp., see pp. 38-39. Another good book is “Musonius Rufus and Education in the Good Life”, J. T. Dillon, University Press of America, Dallas, Lanham, Boulder, New York, Oxford, 2004, 101 pp.

Why One Should Disdain Hardships

Musonius Rufus

In order to support more easily and more cheerfully those hardships which we may expect to suffer in behalf of virtue and goodness, it is useful to recall what hardships people will endure for unworthy ends. 

Thus for example consider what intemperate lovers undergo for the sake of evil desires, and how much exertion others expend for the sake of making profit, and how much suffering those who are pursuing fame endure, and bear in mind that all of these people submit to all kinds of toil and hardship voluntarily. Is it not then monstrous that they for no honorable reward endure such things, while we for the sake of the ideal good - that is not only the avoidance of evil such as wrecks our lives, but also the acquisition of virtue, which we may call the provider of all goods - are not ready to bear every hardship? 

And yet would not anyone admit how much better it is, in place of exerting oneself to win someone else’s wife, to exert oneself to discipline one’s desires; in place of enduring hardships for the sake of money, to train oneself to want little; instead of giving oneself trouble about getting notoriety, to give oneself trouble how not to thirst for notoriety; instead of trying to find a way to injure an envied person, to inquire how not to envy anyone; and instead of slaving, as sycophants do, to win false friends, to undergo suffering in order to possess true friends? 

Now, since, in general, toil and hardship are a necessity for all men, both for those who seek the better ends and for those who seek the worse, it is preposterous that those who are pursuing the better are not much more eager in their efforts than those for whom there is small hope of reward for all their pains.

Yet when we see acrobats face without concern their difficult tasks and risk their very lives in performing them, turning somersaults over up-turned swords or walking ropes set at a great height or flying through the air like birds, where one misstep means death, all of which they do for a miserably small recompense, shall we not be ready to endure hardship for the sake of complete happiness? For surely there is no other end in becoming good than to become happy and to live happily for the remainder of our lives. 

One might reasonably reflect upon characteristics even of certain animals which are very well calculated to shame us into endurance of hardships. At all events, cocks and quails, although they have no understanding of virtue as man has and know neither the good nor the just and strive for none of these things, nevertheless fight against each other and even when maimed stand up and endure until death so as not to submit the one to the other. 

How much more fitting, then, it is that we stand firm and endure, when we know that we are suffering for some good purpose, either to help our friends or to benefit our city, or to defend our wives and children, or, best and most imperative, to become good and just and self-controlled, a state which no man achieves without hardships. 

And so it remains for me to say that the man who is unwilling to exert himself almost always convicts himself as unworthy of good, since “we gain every good by toil.”

These words and others like them Musonius then spoke, exhorting and urging his listeners to look upon hardship with disdain.

0000000000000000

The above text was reproduced from “The Aquarian Theosophist”, November 2012 edition.

00000000000000


On the difference betweentruth and falsehood in the modern esoteric movement, see the book “The Fire and Light of Theosophical Literature”, by Carlos Cardoso Aveline.  Published in 2013 by The Aquarian Theosophist, the volume has 255 pages and can be obtained through Amazon Books.
  
On Facebook, see the pages The Aquarian Theosophist  and  E-Theosophy.

  

If you want to have access to a daily study of the original teachings of Theosophy, write to  lutbr@terra.com.br  and ask for information on the e-group  E-Theosophy.


00000000000000000000000000000000000000
Viewing all 550 articles
Browse latest View live